He clearly never learns...Get rid!!

Just make him dye his hair blonde as a forfeit.

he came in drunk again to training this week ,as well as missing two training sessions over the chalenge cup W/E the club have told his agent to find him another club ,and none of the first team are talking to him at the moment the club have offered him councelling but he refused ,not liked at the club

Has he changed his name to King by deed poll?

IF true, then I hope to see him pushing trollies in Aldi soon, all he deserves.

They seem to be all talking to him at the player of the year awards on tuesday mate,but id still not be surprised to see him gone,what would everyone think if rich got rid and what would they options at fullback be??

also could the decission on hall be changed?

"Why didn't he do it sooner?" would be my thought if this has been going on for weeks - simply not fair to everyone else who's knuckling down at the business end of the season. If we lose to Rovers because Hall drops a Dobson bomb, the fault will lie squarely with Tansey as our specialist FB.

Horne/Whiting to FB and a new 6, (preferably Leon Pryce

) for me.

IF Agar has gotten rid of a gebuine bad apple then I would back him 100%, we spent too many years tolerating that kind of behaviour, it's why I am glad we didn't get Mason and we got rid of other players.

What I would like is to sign a replacement for Horne and stick Richard at fullback, Hall isn't the solution I am afraid.

No brainer.

Ship Tansey, keep Hall

But none of us actualy know if it has been going on for weeks,its only rumours on here,last time rich dropped him for whatever he did and maybe this is the 2nd incident and hes been dropped again (rightly so) and that maybe the end,im sure all will be revealed,rich seems pretty ruthless on didcipline from what i can gather.

im sure agar would get the blame for that

I wasn't a fan of Hall and was happy to see we decided not to renew his contract but in the last few weeks he seems to have really had a kick up the a@@e and has played well in the full back role, personally I would think about keeping him (unless he has already signed for another club but keeping it quiet)

Hes not put pen to paper with any club and im sure hed jump at the chance to stay,he realy doesnt want to leave and like you say hes had 2 very good games against wire and leeds.

People don't know what has actually happened but are just guessing , I wouldn't have a problem with hall getting a new deal but he is not a full back

I'm looking like a lone voice here; Tansey is our best fullback. We need people who can produce a bit of magic if we have any hope of progressing in the play offs. Play him in the play offs and then get rid.

would he be 100% if he knew or thought he was been kicked out??

check ur in box on fb m8

i have and your wrong re hall

Whatever he has done must warrant this descision.
Tansey is one of our best attacking options . To leave him out is a big call. I think Morgan will be more pleased than Agar that he is missing.
He needs to sort himself out and grasp the chance of a RL career he has been given.

Wow! Ruthless. I'm impressed

Come on, spill!

Although I was OK with the release of Hall I would much rather have him playing fullback with his faults than have Tansey taking the mickey out of my club on multiple occasions. If Tansey has transgressed again we should consider getting rid. He's not good enough to be given too many chances.

[/u


I was told Hall signed for Rovers very soon after been told by FC that he could go?

Tansey knows him well from Sydney too

If a player has broken a club rule or not been honouring his contract then that player should be dealt with, if he continues then he goes end off. Trouble is at FC some players have to toe the line and others seem to be able to flout the rules.

Having a good code is a good thing in most business ventures, operating it seems to be difficult at sports clubs.

No he isn't a full back.

What he is, is a locally grown, creative centre, something we haven't seen for many a decade

Agreed 100%