That song doesn't bother me, but it could have been sung at better times, ie not when one of their players is down with what appeared to be a serious injury, based on the reactions of players around him. I'm sure that agressive songs aren't what he'd want to hear at that time.

If he is not reject material then why was he told that he would not play for us again regardless if he got a new club or not? That tells me he has been REJECTED by the club thus earning him the rightful tag of FC Reject.
I never booed him nor did i chant judas as i was more interested in how our own players were playing.

Didn't hear any boo's for Kingy - only those for Judas.

Shame on those who booed Kingy - there are very few players who would have stayed at their club no matter what like Kingy. Yes his off the field drinking was his eventual downfall but no-one can question where his loyalty well and truly laid.

Always been a big fan of Kingy, shame he always put Charleston club before Hull Fc as a club.Was only saying the other day that I was reading Kingys testimonial programme and it had little write ups from past and present players and funnily enough most of them mention the boozing before the rugby, shame really could quite easily be an international forward even maybe now if he'd of been abit more commited. To all the morons booing him, give your head a bang, he always gave nothing but 100% for us...Good luck at Wakey Kingy, and get on the tradmill your looking abit chubby ha ha ha

And you call other people 'Morons'.

he could have been an international, Noble did state that if it wasnt for his off the field antics and he wanted to change he would have been picked for international duties. On the 100% for hull bit, his heart was there but his head wasnt

100% loyal to Hull FC as a club in terms of not wanting to go anywhere else I
accept, 100% commited in terms of his on-pitch performances he certainly wasn't.

I don't dislike Kingy at all, I was just pointing out the massive inconsistencies in that poster's comment, how can he have put the Charleston before FC yet at the same time never have given the club less than 100%....

yeah i know this, but he could have been international

charleston,parkers-he gets everywhere!!!

He [iwas [/ian international - in 2001, which speaks volumes.

I dont think it's been said, but fair play to Kingy, he's missed 6 weeks due to swine flu. (I didnt know)

Jokes aside he looks to be over that and will do a good job for Wakey

Well, thats the first time thats been banded about on here.

Personally I think you have made that up. NO BODY in professional sport turns out for nothing.



I still find it odd that some persist with this notion that King gave everything for the cause. FFS the club effectively showed him the door for not being committed enough to train and look after his body in a professional manner.

Paul King may well be a supporter of Hull FC, but as a paid employee he certainly did not give 100% all of the time.

Dont accuse me of making anything up and go do some history lesson on FC and Kingy and you'll find out I'm correct. I suppose you must have been one of the ill informed booers then

I've looked and can find no mention anywhere of Paul having played for Hull FC for free, I think you're wrong.

not sure it was for free but he defo took a huge paycut when FC were in financial trouble.

The way I look at it he was stood by for long enough to ensure him a testemonial, so I doubt he's out of pocket when everything is taken into account, he may have played for a reduced wage but that isn't the same as playing for free. Having said that anyone booing him on Friday is best described as being "a bit thick", I gave Paul enough aggrevation when he was an FC player (as was my right, as someone who contributed to his wages), he's moved on and FC have moved on, it was done above board and in good faith (like not paying him all at once so he couldn't pi%% it all up against the wall)

he didnt play for nothing but took a HUGE cut for a wee while

Are you sure that you didn't mean he had a HUGE wee while he was half cut?

I doubt it was a cut anything near 50% of what his testemonial made him?

cant disagree with you there!!

[/u

thought that went to his bookie!!!!!!

I'll accuse you of making things up when you clearly have.

Not going to disclose amount, but I was in a privileged position information wise around the time of the Lloyd era. NO BODY played for nothing. There is nothing ill informed about that.



As to the issue of booing. Not my style to boo anyone. There is simply no point. But hey, you carry on believing the myth that King was an unpaid, fully committed servant of Hull FC

he made an illegal tackle didnt he??

Game, set and match?