whiting, calders, briscoe, yeaman, hall, turner, horne
omeley, berro, radders, manu, tickle, fitz
tansey, moa, dowes, lauaki

give moa a go, he must be chompin at the bit surely and id get tom back in the centre, hes not a winger, his strength is going up the middle like at saints when he scored even tho he came in off the wing to do it. and he cant handle the high ball to the wing.

1 Whiting
2 Calderwood
3 Hall
4 Yeaman
5 T. Briscoe
6 Horne
7 Tansey

8 Radford
9 Berrigan
10 O'Meley
11 Tickle
12 Manu
13 Fitzgibbon

14 Houghton
15 Lauaki
16 Dowes
17 Moa

Couldn't agree more. I'm a big fan of Whiting's and I thought he did very well on Friday but, in my opinion, he didn't do anything to suggest he should oust Jordan Tansey from the full back spot. Let's not forget that Tansey has been one of our stand-out players so far this season and I think he offers more in that position.

I'd keep Turner in the halves if Long is missing, and it'd be between Calderwood, Whiting, and Hall for the right wing and centre positions for me. I think Whiting should probably be the right centre but it's a tough break for whoever misses out as they've all been playing well.

Good position for Agar to be in.

only a fool would replace craig hall in the centres for whiting no matter how well he played last

1 Whiting
2 Calderwood
3 Hall
4 Yeaman
5 T. Briscoe
6 Horne
7 Tansey/Turner
8 Dowes
9 Berrigan
10 O'Meley
11 Tickle
12 Fitzgibbon
13 Washbrook

14 Turner/Tansey
15 Lauaki
16 Manu
17 Moa/Radford

dint tansey play half back at the end of last season think it was against quins?

Well here's a fool as mentioned previousley

Tansy at Full back
Whiting back to Centre
Turner and Horne stay
Moa for CACK (SORRY YAK)
Washbrook for either Houghton Berrigan both as good as each other for me
Rest stays same until Long is back

So berrigan is only as good as houghton and washbrook is better than both? Interesting assessment.

I also like your idea of having 3 centres and 14 men on the pitch. We should go well with that

You would consider dropping Berrigan for Washbrook?

Cack? Houghton & Berrigan as good as each other?

Tansey said in the paper that he wants to play full back and that was one of the reasons why he came to the club. I would put him at full back and let him float around in the attacking line. Turner and Horney did well last week and I think we do need a settle half back pairing when longy is injured. This way we are not disrupting the team too much

For me it would be Tansey back to Full back , Whiting to the bench in place of Houghton (Whiting gives more options in different positions than Houghton and would like to see Berrigan play 80 mins) and the rest of the team stays as it was last week (if all fit)

Berrigan, T Briscoe, Calderwood, Cusack, Dowes, Fitzgibbon, Hall, Horne, Houghton, Lauaki, Manu, O’Meley, Radford, Tansey, Tickle, Turner, Washbrook, Whiting, Yeaman

Hoooo Leeeeeee Poooop

Still no Moa then.

Whiting
Calderwood
Hall
Yeaman
T Briscoe
Turner
Horne
Radford
Berrigan
O’Meley
Tickle
Manu
Fitzgibbon

Cusack
Dowes
Lauaki
Tansey (Tansey should have to earn his place back after a disciplinary issue)

I'd go with that.

I'd swap Tansey and Turner, the rest picks itself.

I'd go with that too, especially the bit about Tansey. Yes he knows he was daft, but he shouldn't just walk back in, particularly as Whiting did a great job in his place.

I agree with you on that.

I agree with you, Tansey is going to get his first choice position back at some point so it might as well be now. Yes, Whitting did a decent job but he does most of the time but he aint going to be the first choice full-back at the club long term, unlike Tansey.

Tansey should come straight back for the simple reason that he's our best FB. Just because he was suspended doesn't change that, however harsh it might be Whiting should be on the bench as he isn't better than what we've got in any of the positions he plays.

1. Tansey
2. Calderwood
3. Hall
4. Yeaman
5. Briscoe (maybe drop him and move Hall to wing Whiting to centre)
6. Turner
7. Horne
8. O'Meley
9. Berrigan
10. Radford
11. Manu
12. Tickle
13. Sir Fitzgibbon

14. Dowes
15. Cusack
16. Lauaki
17. Whiting

harsh as it may seem,i can see turner being left out,along with washbrook.i'd prefer to see turner at least on the bench,but somehow i can't see it!!

I'm going to assume all the "dont change a winning team" mob will be online soon to disagree with you.

Personally I think that if you are dropped from the team for disciplinary reasons and your replacement gets MOM you dont deserve to simply walk back into the team. You should earn the right to get your place back as its your own fault you lost it in the first place. If we were struggling for options I could see the arguement for bringing him straight back in but just because he is one of our better players it shouldn't guarantee his place IMO.

well said!!!!totally agree

Is big Sam wasting his time with us ??

He signs a two year deal and takes up our last quota space and it seems that, short of some unforeseen crisis, Agar will just not pick him.

Is there something that we don't know about going on ??