In my opinion way.

I'd switch Horne and Tony around. Horne's not doing too well at SO, but looked quite good at FB when he played there. Tony is a very good attacking player, but can come up with a few howlers under the high ball. A fit Motu is well worth having in your squad, but not necessarily as a first choice number 1.

You don't need to be fit to catch a ball.

I guess you mean no better than?

You know how I feel about Hall's treatment. And Horne's form has been up and down all season. Maybe struggling more at 6 due to not having anyone at 7 to do the organising.

Rusty. All players are prone to errors after such a long time out.

In my opinion, they only place for Motu Tony at the moment is either Centre or Hooker.

We have 3 hookers playing at the moment. Do we need another centre?

In that case I'll just ignore it.

Tony is crap at 6/7. Motu's time has passed by at Hull I hope we play Tansey there next year.

Yes i did.

Not having any bugger to organise us more like.

We're all entitled to opinions aren't we?

I ignore yours every day, because I strongly disagree with 99.9% of everything you say. I think you talk absolute garbage.

Why? As your problem with him is his ability under the high ball, where's the problem with him playing 6?

The only problem with that is that Tony has been gash when played in the halves before.

If you were to move him from FB you'd have to be looking at wing, centre, or hooker to get the best out of him. And we already have decent options in those positions.

HUH? Memory problems? Motu Tony has a history gonig back a long way of being dodgy under the bomb, it's well known amongst coaches hence the fact they often put him under pressure. The Salford game was the perfect example. They were 50 yards out and put up a bomb, no one does that to Wellens or Briscoe because they know they'll just gobble them up. Tony made a hash of it and put for a dubious refereeing decision Salford would have won the game.

I suppose he has played there loads recently for you to be able to make such a judgement.



It's not next year yet.

i would like to see him there dont think G.Horne has done nothing since he has come back

and whiting shouldnt be on the bench he has been brilliant for us since he has come back

Where have I stated anything about my problem with him being under the high ball?

We have better options at 6. I wouldn't have a problem with him playing 6, but we just have better options.

Where did I say you weren't entitled to one?

If you can't back it up with anything better than just 'it's my opinion' why should anyone else just accept it?






Bless.

I'd not like to see him play 7 - he's not an organiser - but as a running 6 in the role Horne is supposed to play, he'd be a decent option.

Salford game, hmmm when was that ?

You mentioned his mistakes. As most of his mistakes come under the high ball...

We used him at 6 a few times in his first season with us IIRC. He was poor. I guess he might be better there now, but it would be a risk.

I don't need to be accepted by anyone. I'm quite happy with my opinions, and I'll always state them.

I don't need to back anything up.

I have seen him play there before. If he was good there dont you think he might just have made a career out of it ? He is an excellent hooker and a good utility back. And as for your question about Hudds lets see where they finish come the end of the season. Although they have Robinson who is better than anything we have in that position and they have a better pack than we do. Once again - they have better players overall than we do. Now without answering my question with one of your own who is world class in Hull's team ?

AKA I don't have anything to back it up.

[size=200Briscoe[/size