He's going down then

An hour ago Rule and Radford were saying how different his case was from Bird and what an assett to the club he would be. Get all the bad news out of the way, whilst we were gloating about Justine!!! FFS.

Like you did with Walker and Chester..........both are biscuit bodys.

Chief Executive James Rule said: “We obviously feel sorry for Stuart. However, we cannot retain a player after he has failed our rigorous medical examination......
was this the same examination that dykes had???? what a complete t!t......
why dont you make a rod for your own back james.......

Surely a player should be given a medical prior to starting his new career.

Clearly on Humberside they do things differently and give people a job, then weeks later decide to see if they are fit enough to do that job.

He was sticking up for the club he loves. We'd pay the fine for him. Whereas I suspect most of your fans would do the same for your upper management.

At least we have got rid..........if he had turned out like Dykes then it would be why we signed him.

Both have turned out for us.

So will a defeat at Salford or the news Crocker isn't coming be the straw that once and for all breaks the camels back?

You lot deserve far, far better than this.

you couldnt make it up





you'v just got to laugh

How about this....he is available and other clubs want him...we sign him subject to undergoing a strict medical when we can and we may be waiting for scan results..........but before we find out,lets all have a pop.

Personally....think they have done right.

So they embarrass the fans by signing him

Now they do it again by releasing him 2 weeks later

We should not have gone anywhere near him, not for his off field antics but simply down to the FACT he had played only 40 odd games in four years!!!!

What the fook are we playing at!!!!!!!

I guess they're scared of the publicity if Reardon gets sent down tomorrow. I wonder if there will be a reversal of the decision if all he gets is community service? Maybe Hull will announce they'd confused Reardon with some academy lad after all?

Gotta fess, this makes your club look seriously silly.

Got a line to canberra have you?

Then do that before you release information that you have signed him.

Our club is a absolute laughing stock. not only do we not go out and get a recognised top quality number 7. Not had one since 1991 {Greg Mackey} We then supposidly sign a player who has not played for 8 months without first doing a medical. Then 2 weeks later release him.
The management of the club needs to decide if they are up to the job and if not ship out and get people in who can manage.
Our so called chief exc would much rather go on tour {to Ireland} with a rugby union team then do his paid job.
This incompertance has to stop or we have no chance of beening anything other then also rans in the competion.

Just a couple of points amongst all the hysteria.

Reardon's contract was contingent upon two conditions...

1. His full recovery from his achilles injury
2. Getting a non-custodial sentence

Clearly, he's failed on the first condition. I doubt he'll have been paid, because until he met the first condition he didn't have an actual contract with us - hence how he can be released swiftly and easily now.

Carry on.

Well no, I don't know fook all really.

we were clearly lied to this evening though, Rule was going on about what a good signing it was only 2 hours ago

You named him in a 19 man squad so he has to be contracted and registered with the RFL for that to happen

Dont state facts Kosh.....the muppets dont like it.

Good should never have signed him in the first place. lets close this chapter and move on to the next who knows we might be able to close another chapter soon with any luck

It's hard to keep that kind of information quiet, and if they'd tried and failed it would have been blamed on his criminal record rather than medical grounds.

At least they had the sense to make the contract dependent on his fitness this time. One step at a time...