Yup

I don't think it is at all, without him I really think we may have been nilled against Quins.

good for you

so another person isnt allowed and opinion cause someone eles heard it on the radio

give me a break

You're allowed your opinion... It's just wrong.

i will get a ban now for showing a mod up

Really? You honestly don't see the connection?



Fook me.

Did he, or did he not, make two tries today?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

I'm sorry, but Craig Hall is not good enough. His catching leaves a lot to be desired. His positioning, although improved, is not good. His returns aren't too bad because he is quick, but he gets battered in the collision every time and it takes an eternity for him to get a PTB because of this. The rare times he does do something exceptional, you can count on him doing something to feck it up because he gets too excited and ejaculates or something, leading him to do something stupid like run into touch, throw a stupid pass or not even pick the ball off the floor.

I just don't think he'll ever be good enough. He can be exceptional at times, but that doesn't make up for the MANY flaws in his game that I don't think we will be able to improve.

I hate to break it to you, but I don't think he was laughing [iwith[/i you.

oh so what

he made two tries so what

it means fook all if hes messing three up does it

Top post. He made 2 or 3 key errors today, and would not be in my 17 if everyone was fit/available. Problem is we have no one else available at the moment.

If he made two tries, he didn't do 'fook all'.

And he didn't mess up three tries either.

Hall's played only a few games at FB and has already shown improvement as you duly mention. Atleast he does something exceptional in order to mess it up, more then the rest of the team does. The ball off the floor is very harsh, he had to rush for it so that the Salford player didn't get a free PTB as no one else was there.

I think the influence he has on our attack negates a few dropped balls, without him we look like doing all.

Showing yourself up mate, no one else.

Was he the only one?

If not, will all the others miss out on your 17 as well?

How many tries did his errors cost us? More than the two that he was instrumental in scoring?

the radio said so did it

why didnt calderwood stay at fullback

They only scored three, and one was down to Briscoe, so the rest is simple maths.

im very sure cooke and dobson will be looking forward to high bomb hall all afternoon

is danny 2 the number of brain have cells you have,why is it people like you pick on the one person be it hall,lee,etc the whole team was poor today hence the word team its a collective...lets not forget the kid is a not a fullback where he scored alot of points last season less you forget....

What a pathetic thread.

Is it better to do something exceptional and then mess it up in such a spectacular fashion that we lose possession, or to do something basic and keep possession? The things that Craig Hall does exceptionally is from chancing his arm and it paying off at times, but the problem is he doesn't know when not to and royally fooks up.

He is not solid enough at FB. Horney is a much better full back, as is Thorman. Unfortunately, that weakens our halves as well. But we have more players that can play half-back better than Hall can play FB.

If there are no changes made after this, and we get stuffed by Rovers, I won't keep coming back from Leeds to watch this rubbish every weekend. If they aren't going to bother, why should I? I don't mind being sh*t. I do mind paying to watch a club that at times doesn't seem to give a crap and doesn't do much to change this.

hence why i said drop him from fullback