Was thinking that your poor show had nothing to do with how well the opposition plays though. This has to be a major part in the way you played.

Ultimately Yeaman's non-pass to a wide open Briscoe cost us the game.

You didn't see the game.

I've spoken to people who have, and we were poor.

I don't really care if you can't handle the truth, but it would be nice if you stopped whining so much on here.

There are times when that's the case.

Tonight wasn't one of them.

contributed to costing us the game, on paper or stats would show missed conversions

Or Tickles 'missed' conversion,but credit were its due Cas deserved the win tonigh IMO and certainly wanted it more in the last quarter.

Reel your neck in dopey.........you deserved the win but if Tickle had his boots on we would have won by playing $hite.....we can go a lot better...you cant.

i would say our team is better than yours
however i would say tonight you was the better team, simple as.

The truth? I thought it was your opinion. I also thought this was a forum, you know, a place for fans to talk about rugby.

Always nice to talk to someone who can't respond without an insult. It's rather pathetic really, I'm only expressing my opinion.

Ignore him mate...how he can comment by listening on radio is beyond me.

You probably are the better team, but the suggestion of some that we only won because you were poor is an insult to us really.

So was i...

How do you come to this conclusion numpty ?

I think Hull are a class act this year, and hope you do well.
But that statement is poo, what do you base it on ? How do you know that you can play better and Cas can not.

Well we managed to outscore you by being poor so that should be a big concern to you.

Dude need i remind you that you lost!
How did you out score us ?

the truth is, we were poor, we played dumb, don't be so defensive, did you go tonight? when the stats show what fcs' completion rate in the first half was, then you will see how poor we was, and there wasn't much of an improvement in the second half.

Yeah, except I can express an opnion without resorting to petty insults.


Oh yeah, I'm very concerned. We beat a very good team in their own back yard who were unbeaten after 5 games. We're really screwed.

No $hit Sherlock.

Try wise....if we was poor how come we breached your defence 4 times by being poor.

It was a game of If's; If Yeamo had passed, If Tickle had kicked 1 of those goals, If Calderwood had scored in the corner,
If Hall had caught 1 of those kicks or dropped balls, If Berro had passed to Thorman at the end and of course, If Dixon had missed 1 of his kicks.

We lost the plot at times with some of the silly passes. I'm still fairly pleased with the effort, it's mainly down to the execution.

You won. We were poor. These are both facts. You're welcome to join them up how you like.

I've never understood why some fans get worked up about this TBH. You got the two points - surely that's all that matters?

I know that if we'd won tonight and gone top of the table I wouldn't give a flying one about how we did it.

No, one is fact, one is opinion.

Just forget it.....said you was the better team but was raising a valid point...enjoy $hagging your sister.

Who said you were poor, like i said earlier watched you last week agaisnt Bradford and you team were awesome, a very good display.

What as Sherlock Holmes got to do with it?

Cas were the better team at home to Harlequins & Huddersfield - guess what we lost!

You take the rough with the smooth....