Nope - they're commenting because they're anti-Hull FC. Anything that affects Hull City and their agreement is down to the agreement they have with the SMC and nothing to do with Hull FC. They're different agreements. Even my 10 year old understands that maybe you're younger I don't know.

Council have made a statement that they will meet SMC to discuss things

Can't see them wanting to take the stadium back in the current financial circumstances.

Hmmmmmmmmmm.

Latest from Humberside is that Hull City Council, will meet with the SMC to discuss SMC's proposal, that they may hand the operations over to another company.

I wonder why AP is keeping stum

Don't think Pearson has the resources to take on the SMC as well as funding FC and trying to buy a Soccer club.

In any case, I'd prefer a neutral party in charge.

Got to be honest and agree with that.

Clarkey on Hull FC Live just confirmed that the club will not be making a comment at the moment as they don't believe the issue should be resolved via the media. He said they've had not direct contact from either the SMC or Council but would be happy to join in any dialogue between all three interested parties.

He also went out of his way to thank the fans for our efforts.

Your right there Kosh, it has to be a neutral party in charge, thats the only way either can go forward

Has to be the way forward, otherwise it will just be storing up similar trouble for the future.

Adam Pearson's Group Maybe??

perfect FC no need for anything else despite certain shrill voices on this forum.

Even when Pearson was in charge at Hull City, i wished someone in charge of the stadium
would be completely neutral, and in the current climate. this is the most sensible way to go.

However the Council may go with somebody, with a proven track record at the KC. - i hope not.

Are you a hull fan, of course you are and if your a moderator as well that makes you even harder.You'll be calling posters thickos next,still we accept that seeing as we know your speaking from experience.!

Bless.

The problem is it is all linked I am afraid and you cannot say it is not your problem because if the losses were suddenly split in whatever ratio , it would become of interest to FC . I have not seen the agreement and I dare say only a few people have and so it is unknown if this would ever happen .

What everyone can agree on is the stadium is beginning to look a little tired now and costs will be going up as maintenance costs increase, revenue will need to increase for the SMC to cover these extra costs .

Very impressed with your 10 year olds knowledge , do not come across others with that .

Are you serious?

This thread started with 100 pages of abuse aimed at the owner of Hull City.

Are you really a moderator of this board?

Ignore that, if Brady and Geraghty can get voted into office, there's no reason why you wouldn't get voted moderator of this board.

I've posted nothing but reasonable comments and I've limited them all to threads relating issues that concerned my club, I will continue to do so. I'm a very reasonable bloke.

No it didn't.


You hide it well.

Bring on the sponge Kosh is a punch bag tonight

Get over yourself.

The criticism has been directed against the owner(s) of the SMC

I have been reading this thread for a number of days now and Lambrettaman is correct , the Allams have been vilified by a large majority of the posts . I fully understand the JW issue is an emotive subject to FC fans but as with most situations , there are always 2 sides to a story and in the past couple of days a lot more of the other side has come out .

Having read Lambrettamans comments on various City forums for a number of years , I can confirm he is a decent bloke !

Nah. It's like being savaged by dead sheep.

I don't care how long you've been reading, he isn't correct. And neither are you.

I've read your post but none of it has any weight or meaning. How can SMC losses directly affect Hull FC ? There are set agreements in place for each tenant and if you think that they include over riders in case the SMC are losing money then I think you're desperate. The Allams didn't HAVE to buy the SMC - they thought it would help them acquire the stadium - it doesn't seem to be working out that way at the moment hence the hysterics.

It is far from perfect, the shrill voices on this board were deafening early in the week at the disgust of the removal of the picture of Johnny, SMC & City have put their side of the story out in the public domain, we now have every right to hear the side of Hull FC and an explanation as to why the picture was removed and a reassurance that it will be put back..Nothing has changed since the shrill started earlier this week.

Only a City fan, believing dribble written in the Mail, would repeat that "the Stadium is looking rather tired now". The Stadium is in excellent shape and I can't see where any remedial work has been carried out???