He was not dropped because of Lam trying out options. How many more times does it need to be said? If you think I'm talking BS, that's up to you.

Don't suppose we'll ever know the full story unless it hits the press

He was dropped because he hasn’t been playing well enough to be in the 17, IF something else has gone on then fair do’s - out of interest who would you have played him instead of (sorry Hull fans, not really for this forum

)

It may never come out, but Zak deserved to be left out, and now that McIntosh has stepped up nicely, Zak may never get in again. That point has been strengthened with us signing Bailey Hodgson, hence why I said in my original post, he might be joining you sooner than you think. That's if you want him early.

Are you sure about that Col?

With Sutcliffe picking up what looks a potentially bad injury then taking Hardaker early might be a necessary move

My old mate Cokey knows his onions, Hardaker is a good player, but he’s not what we need, apart from his qualities, he’s no role model, bad decision for this guy, understandable as we were desperate but wrong.

My old mate Cokey knows his onions, Hardaker is a good player, but he’s not what we need, apart from his qualities, he’s no role model, bad decision to sign this guy, understandable as we were desperate but wrong move.

So again, who in that 17 last night would you have dropped for him ??

Sorry Col, I don't understand that question, It doesn't make sense.

[urlhttps://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/leigh-leopards-notebook-bailey-hodgson-tom-aspinall-darnell-mcintosh?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1722184494-1[/url

That's cleared that up then. So much bull posted on this site.

[size=150Listen you. I am not a liar. You believe what you want[/size.

Touched a nerve.

[size=200I think you did!!!!![/size

No one has said you are a liar, but you pay not be right though.

Blimey Dave, don't you start, I thought you were better than that.

Unfortunately buddy, unless you have some evidence we only have the word of a random poster. Lam says it was a selection choice, unless something else comes out, we have to belive Lam.

Ok.

Although it wouldn't be a massive shock if you correct and he has been a naughty boy.

All Cokey needs to do is post what exactly what he reckons Hardaker has done. If it's true it's not libel. Just posting vague suggestions make it sound aside from Lam's comments.

OK, Hardaker has done something unmentionable that we may or may not ever find out and Cokey thinks Adrian Lam is a liar. Glad we cleared that up.

Hardakerwatch

Training today with Leigh.

Have we made a mountain out of a molehill?

Looks like some have. There's nothing to suggest that he been in trouble again. Why would Leigh hush it up anyway, he's only there for another two months.