Wouldnt say he's a moron, i just feel he's out his depth...

Sad thing is, I'm beyond caring now.
Sure there's quite a few others who feel the same way.

I know, im in the same camp at the moment

Funny how people who claim not to care still post?

......ad nauseam.

To be honest at times I wish i didn't. But I do and always will. COYH

Noble also has a good relationship with Pryce as could be seen on the SL show this week, and coached Ellis at GB level. Obviously you don't pick a coach just because they know/get on with the players, but knowing the the current coach, the captain and one of the halfbacks and what makes them tick is surely an ideal scenario to make an instant impact

He strikes me a a coach who players listen to and respect (with the possible exception of Sean Long

).

Not sure the same can be said of our current coach or the previous two.

Maybe it's time for a reality check ? Maybe the players just aren't good enough, whoever the coach is ?

No doubt but it's the coach who has recruited this squad

True. He seemed to have difficulty recognising a fair few players featuring in the clips they were showing though. I did wonder how up to speed he actually is with today's game.

Shall we have yet another squad clearout???

That's what happens when you don't get it right the first time. Or should we just stick with players that clearly aren't good enough?

Until the players contracts expire,we have no choice, as Pearson has stated there will be no more contracts severed.

As for players which are not good enough, Yeaman,Green,Feka,Howarth & Cunningham have to go -IMO

More importantly.Radford needs an attack coach to be employed, whether he gets one... is another matter.

Fixed that for you, Radford should be no-where near OUR club, he's a chancer and a poor one at that, no attack coach will help us with him at the helm I'm afraid. he's far too deluded and up himself already thinking he was anywhere near good enough or experienced enough to take on this job. Pearson must have being blackmailed by Radford to offer him the role..

Most of the players aren't good enough, but to attract better we need a proven, respected name as head coach. Money is the biggest factor for players when choosing a club, but given a straight choice of playing for a club showing signs of improvement with a respected coach, or a team heading for the Championship with the pub landlord in charge you know who a player will pick.

What is Cunningham based on? Can't have played more than 2 full games at hooker for hull.

Indeed, plus with the salary cap system you have to factor in that he will be one of the lowest earners. It's the players like Yeaman who are on big salaries but not performing who are the bigger issue.

Is it that Yeaman isn't performing, or that he's doing as he's told, and what he is being told is bang average?

yeaman good in his day,but that was a few years ago, do we give logan a go? will he improve the team? trouble is if he was given a starting spot and had a bad game some on here would be calling him to,

You don't have to try and make everything a part of your anti-Radford agenda. Yeaman has not performed for quite some time, whoever has been the coach. The occasional good game is not sufficient reason for him to be selected.

how can you accuse me of any agenda? It was a genuine question, are we getting good attacking plays?

I think the clue is in your posts since you registered yesterday.

commenting on the current situation, that is all.

Of course!!!