Only watched the second half and I thought we were a very predictable side.Any coach watching this will not have sleepless nights trying to wonder what Hull will do next.We only started to throw the ball around with 3 minutes left to go.Did any of our forwards hurt theirs in the tackle.Before any one states its only our second defeat, I feel changes need to happen,not large scale, just one or two to give people a rest and to keep the others on their toes.

very good, did you think that up yourself? ...... i was trying to have a debate about the game .......

I was trying to alleviate a depressing evening with a little light humour.

Hey ho.

No you wasn't, you've been trying to defend a very poor performance by us.

a lot of half chances tho, thormans 3 kicks to calderwood, briscoe at the end, halls break at the beginin which if he had any support could of done bit better. in the first 5 minutes we had 2 sets of 6 on their try line nd then dicided to go 4 the 2 points wen they got another set of 6.

Is this because Moa doesn't play more than 10mins? Our forwards looked gone after 60mins......... again

It could have been a million times better. Just dont think there was a big difference between the teams. It was another game there for the taking, when asked to step up and take the game we couldnt.

All in the first half.

In the second half we were just garbage.

Whoever said we don't need Crocker must be joking,on this showing we need him and a strike centre who can break the line.We certainly need to splash the cash,we started the season well but we seemed to have gone back into our shell.We fell into Harlequins hands by playing their kind of game.

Not really. Even before Moa came over Agar liked to us Radford, Tickle and Manu for almost 80 mins each and Dowes and Cusack for 60 mins each.

He needs to sort it out. All of them should only be playing 40 mins, we may as well not even have a bench. Its like he has his favourite 13 and then just some others to cover a middle 10 mins.

Where was thaks he could have mixed it up a bit, and why not washy?

am a fan of kingy but wonder about his fitnesslevels!

quins where a patched up side! where supposed to be in a ok poisition !



it didnt look like that to me??????

worrying times..........................

Washy is less fit than King. Thought King did OK TBH. I'd have still had thacks in instead of Moa. Houghton may as well not be there too for the impact he brought tonight, especially against a very tired pack with heavy conditions.

I thought Kingy was strong, solid and steady. Just didn't get why he only got 5 mins in his second spell???

Only his 2nd game in months, he played reserves last week and was said to look good but short.

can anyone remmember the last time we put 40 points past a team - none this season

HKR at home.

The prop rotation from the bench is certainly baffling. Thacks and King could easily have put in a longer spell tonight (if playing with Thacks

).

Tommy Lee didnt seem to have much game time either?

lets hope 4 a repeat next week.

He came on for Radders on 20 mins and played til 10 or 15 into the 2nd half. Good defensive spell but nothing in attack.

Perfect replacement for Radders then

Some clowns on Radio Humberside calling for Calderwood to be dropped.

Like it was his fault we lost.

Ran his blood to water again, put one stupid kick in but other than that he cant be faulted.

Dack;eads