Come off it Coddy,accents and dialect are part of the English language.
Have you listened to your own `Ull accent?

Dunno I'm still trying to find information on a cumberland shire horse, google's struggling at the moment.

I spoke to a so called die hard hull fan the other day and he is happy to see us lose so long as it puts more nails in agars coffin

He may portray himself as a die hard hull fan Wolfie, but he clearly is not imo..

Doesn't surprise me, sadly - we've seen similar sentiments expressed on here occasionally. I can't get my head around it TBH. How can you be a fan and want us to lose?

Why don't you introduce him to this board?
He'd feel right at home.

What a ludicrous outlook.The only time I can feel reasonable if we lose is when the team give 100%.

Pragmatism?

I know Agar is a terrible coach and we'll never amount to anything while he's running things, so I can understand wanting to lose games in the short term in order to his accelerate his removal and hopefully the appointment of a proper head coach that would ensue.

That said when it comes to game day I can't help but want us to win, although if for example in the last game of the regular season we had to win just to scrape into the top 8 then I would want us to lose because by then Agar would have proven beyond any doubt how bad he is, but sneaking into the playoffs would probably be used by Rule and co as reason enough to keep him on.

I really don't think that makes me any less of a fan.

Rule and co have given him a 2 year deal, even though he's proved in his tenure so far that he's not a very good coach, so don't hold your breath with regards the scenario you've just described

Hypothetically you would want us to lose the last game in order to NOT make the play-off's just because you do not rate Richard Agar, I am sorry but that is bleeding ridiculous!!!
Agar is just one spoke in the wheel of Hull FC...there is the rest of the coaching staff, the squad and most importantly the 1000s of dedicated fans, but hey ho let us not achieve any thing because you do not rate the coach

Don't really see how thats ridiculous at all. You scrape into the play-offs at 8th your probably going to be crashing out anyway. He is willing to sacrifice short term minor success to remove agar and possibly bring in a top class coach and potentially get long term success.

As he said he cant help but want his team to win on match day but thinking rationally he would give up short term success for long term gain, because of a desire to want his club to win trophies and compete consistently long term.

sounds a bit drastic dunnit!!!!

Spot on, thanks



And as for Agar only being a spoke in the wheel, he's already seen off two assistants who had far more experience than himself and for a long time I've been calling for a clean sweep of all the coaching/technical staff; Crookes, Last, Pope etc... None of them are up to the job.

Here Here 100% agreed

well put, i would definetely give up short term success (ie scraping into the 8, and crashing out at the 1st hurdle) if it meant a clean sweep of ALL the coaching staff, i think this club/supporters deserves a great coach, and IMO Agar unfortunately doesnt do it, although if he does, i will be as happy as the next fan, i just cant see it, unfortunately!

So, we sack every man and his dog and replace them with whom, from where?

Get real

its called wishful thinking, aint going to happen, but you cant help wishing!

ah the old 'who is there out there to replace them with' argument. It's wishful thinking to hope to get rid of them all, but I don't think it's too outlandish to hope that people who consistently fail at what they are paid to do get replaced with fresh blood.

What makes you think if Agar was sacked he would be replaced by "a proper head coach"? It didn't happen when his predecessors were sacked.

How is the brother?

no idea.

No guarantees at all, but at least we'd be shot of Agar and hopefully the board will have learnt their lesson as far as taking cheap options goes. I agree though it wouldn't be certain to happen.

Aren't you friends any more?

Because any top-class coach would be queueing up to be a part of such a loyal set-up wouldn't they?

They'd see the removal of underperforming staff as 'disloyal'? That's funny! Are you a union man by any chance?

Our chances of recruiting a top coach would be improved dramatically if we could also offer them free reign over the composition and recruitment of the coaching set-up to work under them.