I'd hope not, I'd hope they would argue that your interpretation of the evidence what was differed, not the actual law

The fact he is out of contract for next season, or may not make it as an SL prop are irrelevant. Fact is we are short of props, and I would personally say Maloney has offered more than both King and Radford in the prop position (as well as Thackray, but hes still injured). Maloney should have played ahead of Cordoba last week as it was obvious Cordoba wasnt ready as he was battered all over the pitch.
Hall has been drastically messed about, iirc Houghton and Lee have both been dropped this season and now Maloney, and all for overseas players originally, and Agar had the cheek to say in his HDM article hes one of the biggest advocates of bringing through youth! Agar= complete joke

God knows what you'll think when Houghton's loan deal for next season is finalised!

Laws can often be inperpretted differently too!

Are we short of props for next season?

Dowes
Cusack
Lauaki
Radford
O'Meley
King

With maybe Moa staying too.

If we do pay off Radders and King then Maloney may stay as cover but wont regularly feature.

Dowes, Cusack and Lauaki are injured, Radford is in awful form at the moment, as is King and O'Meley doesnt come until next season. Also I would definately say that Moa will still be here tomorrow.

Or of course, you could have for some reason thought I meant for next season and not the current times

Ah, i did think you meant for next season. (mainly as you started your sentence by saying he was ooc for next season then saying we were short of props)

I have a pretty good idea where Dominic will be playing next year too

Prop?

I think people are saying we need to keep hold of Maloney because of his potential rather than his current ability, personally I've never seen him play so can't really comment.

He has plenty of ability and potential for me. However, if we have better in place i would allow him to go. If he is here as cover and wants that role then so be it. Im not fussy either way to be honest.

Yet again we let promising players go, and keep the ordinary, the guy has played well when given the chance and like Moa had good reviews from the u21.

Why do we stick with King Radford, Lee all have been given numerous chances to prove their worth, this guy has not had his, but I guess if you have ability you don't belong at our club.

Now what will our age of the pack be .

Lauaki and Radford are not props. King has already agreed a deal with another club. You are short of props next season.

Maybe they feel Lauaki is closer to fitness than at first thought.

Lauaki has already been earmarked for prop in all the announcements of his signing, and Radford is categorically a prop. You only have to watch him to know that.

[url=http://www.hullfc.com/hullfc/contents/?p=3987Seems like Kath disagrees.[/url

“We spent to salary cap maximum and close to our squad maximum ahead of this season; we then lost Crocker but had no-one available to a good enough quality to replace him with in an ever decreasing player pool."

Unless Crocker was on half a million pounds per year that is.

I dont believe her to be honest but thats a different story !!!

Lauaki and Radford will both play prop. Radford has been doing it for the last year or so.

edited for accuracy

Hopefully he wont be here.

So salary cap pressures have forced him to be released? Why sign that numpty from Oz then?

Whose been released?

If what ive been told is correct he has been told to look for another club but who knows. I still rate him as most on here are aware as being one of our better forwards but if as a club we want to progress the likes of Radders, King, Thacks, Tickle to name just 4 need to be moved on. Not good enough for a team with top 3 ambitions.

The Brother says we're half a million under the cap. Do keep up.