Whats that? "burn baby burn"

Taxi!

you could get yourself in hot water with that post !

Personaly,I would be c) relieved I am not associated with this current side.

I prefer the song every other team sings about Tevez.

Typical Hull will announce 'Thanks to Sam for his efforts but we have decided to let him go' - Only for big Sam to sign for Saints and be the best impact prop in SL

Hull meanwhile will sign a 'utility back' to replace him!

Must say I have seen him several times in the u21s and I don't feel he will give us much. He is good at the impressive fend offs of an unsuspecting player who goes high on him. He is equally imprsesive when he lays a player out with a crunching tackle, like yesterday. BUT he is prone to losing the ball and really makes very few tackle busts against weaker oppositin I might add. This project will not imo be here very long and will certainly not end up at Saints. He is at best NL standard. Probably end up at Donny if anywhere in the UK.

Very harsh on Maloney....he looks a superb prospect.....Id have him in other King.

For me Sam should have been in the 17 yesterday.
We were up against one of, if not [ithe[/i biggest pack of forwards and Agar/Sharp decides to play a 19 year old Hooker who the club are trying to convert into a backrow forward.
We were at times totally out muscled.

Wish he had,he would have kept the sun out of my eyes whilst I was sat in the east stand.

He play in the World Cup and played well

I agree with you Maloney has played well ..was one of our better players first time out against Saints

I personally wouldn't drop king, thackray, dowes, maloney or cusack

Moa should now get a look in that cusack is apparantly out.

He impressed me again against Wire, some cracking hits. However I was surprised that Moa never got picked, we could have done with his size imo, especially in the second half.

As a wire fan i was happy to see that Moa wasn't on the pitch as Paalisena (don't know how to spell his name) smashed us to pieces last year and i thought he may do the same. However we are a lot tougher in defence than last year so who knows

from the HDM's reserves right up

"For Hull Sam Moa was again a handful, and it took four players to tackle him each time he ran the ball in.

Physically he dominated the middle and Warrington had no answer."

surely he has to be given another first team spot soon!

Against Warringtons big pack on Saturday i'd have liked to have seen him on the bench at least.

Has to be near contention, especially now he plays in longer stints in the reserves including 70 mins the other week i believe.

Can't see why, as has been said, he was brought in, played first team and then disappeared to the reserves.

I always thought he could be our Palaessina (albeit perhaps not as devastating) but isn't being given the chance.

Think Agars got no choice now Dave. Bout time too.

Frustrating thing is that Moa looked better and better in the first team and never once looked out of breath when he was taken off after his 15 minute spell.

He must be in contention for Leeds game.

Can't see he has an option can you.
Hope Hames here as John predicted

Think he qualifies for that game under the

"There's no ***** else rule"

now Cusack's out.

If Lauaki is here it would probably mean Moa wont be in the first team unless we start with Dowes and Thacks with Moa and Lauaki off the bench. Could also decide to use Lauaki in the back row i guess in Manu's absence.

Thought Maloney took a knock too

Well he must be able to last longer than Korkidas did yesterday. I was at the Huddersfield game yesterday, he came off after 14 minutes and didn't come on again untill 3 minutes from time! Scott Naylor was pi**ing himself on the Salford bench, "14 minutes, thats a fu**ing disgrace" were his exact words if I remember right.

I said that when Hodgson was on named on the bench as surely Moa would have given us more than a hooker playing in the back row making his debut.