Just Junior, he wasnt an uncle then

If you don't mind, where Moa's development under Agar is concerned, I'll continue to have a different opinion to you. your opinion seems perfectly acceptable to me - it just differs from mine. But you can carry on having a tizzy if you want.

Resorting to baiting now, the classic 'I've made myself look daft (saying Agar is comparible to Fergie and the board re-signed Cusack etc) so I'l accuse the other person of throwing a fit and try to take the high ground' let it drop mate!

Keep trying. You'll have to do better than that.

sarah ferguson

A far more accurate comparison, both seriously out of their depth in the public role they were given

Sarah Ferguson was once photographed having her toes sucked by a bald man! I hope there are no parallels re Mr Agar and his staff!!

Thats a rather Sharpe comparison

If you give enough monkeys typewriters one of them will eventually write the complete works of shakespear

if you give one monkey one typewritter, the first thing itll type will be an improvement on Agars gameplan, lol

I think by pure chance it typed; 'Radford 13'.

I can see Morgan going for Moa if we dont keep him.

unlucky for some..............

Hav they got room? I thought Fitzhenry was being forced out as it is?

In order to sign someone I was under the impression they would have to release some players. Isn't Lovegrove's disspensation coming to an end as well?

I thought similar, isn't it:

Webster non fed
Dobson
Vella
Newton
Galea

Lovegrove non-fed?

Fisher, Gene, Aizue exempt pre-Feb 2007.

I dont know why but I thought if you had players at your club through exemption you couldn't sign anymore "quota" players until your total number including the exemptions was below the maximum? I may have just made that up though

It sounds like just the sort of addendum to put the final nail in the coffin of anyone who thought they grasped the whole thing.

Now that you come to mention it, I do seem to remember something about it. Either that or something where if you brought in new players the exemption wouldn't apply for a further renewal. I.e. if, say, Gene signed a 1-year extension he'd be exempt, but if they brought in a new player for next season a further extension for Gene would have him as a non-fed.

Both sound logical

Yeah it was something along those lines. Probably been scrapped now though because Rovers weren't happy with the rules and would just break them anyway

In which case he may go for King or Thacks instead then!!

He's welcome to them IMO.

Yes please!!