It was no better or no worse than the post it was responding to.

Im sorry, I wasnt aware there had to be a percentage split between positive and negative threads, I also apologise for discussing a possible problem at the club, I wasnt aware it was a taboo subject.

I don't need proof, I'm not making accusations. I never said you were either. I'm sorry I didn't laugh at your post, but it wasn't funny.

Its a non-subject. We're no more or less professional than other clubs. We just do things differently. Team spirit doesn't seem to be lacking so maybe we don't need to spend time away to bond?

But yet you asked me whether I had any when I'd made no accusations of my own.



Then why ask if I had proof?



It wasn't a classic, granted, but neither was it designed to be. I was just poking fun at those who had made the claims that we were like a pub team. And don't feel bad about not laughing at it. After speaking to you on here, I'd guess that you don't laugh at very much.

That is correct. But you don't think you and other people are quick to jump and have a go at him? Leave him be, the rest of us seem to get by ignoring him.

And I apologise for accusing you of only being negative. There that's one apology each. I think we're quits.

Oh hang on - you apologised twice. I also apologise for being ironic.

I never asked you specifically for proof, nor did I accuse you of making accusations. Feel free to re-read.

If we were lounging in the top end of the league this would be fine, but we are in the bottom end, this would suggest the things we do differently are wrong. We should be looking at way teams like Wign & Wire are run including travel etc.

I don't think I've spoken to (or about) him before today for a period of several weeks. Feel free to check my posting history for proof that this isn't the case, but I don't recall any particular instances. However, on the occasions I choose to respond to (or about) him, it is just that: my choice.

If something isnt working, you try something else, correct?
Its blatently obvious what were doing isnt working very well - And as preparation and recovery are as important as any other factors come game day, why dont Hull FC try it.

I don't need to re-read. You asked if anyone had proof. I made a comment that quite clearly wasn't serious and you responded with,

"So, no then?"

As I wasn't making any (serious) accusations, I obviously wasn't going to offer up any proof, was I?

No good apparently ketchup had soaked through the bottom. Hame's NZ dollar coin went straight through.

Well neither Wire nor Wigan will be lounging around the top of the table if they don't pull their socks up.

Oh believe me they will ....

And obviously, as you've just proven, I didn't accuse you nor ask you specifically for any proof. This all seems a bit of a non-event tbh.

A damn sight closer than we are though.
Its obvious that the playing ability is there, and the club just need to find something to help spark that and keep it up consistently, this could possibly help never mind how insignificant it may seen.

Do we even know what we do differently?

You implied that I ought to have offered some by your response. Everything doesn't have to be explicit, you know. Perhaps if you had had the guile to spot that I was actually agreeing with you, this non-event could have been avoided, eh? Maybe next time.

Possibly, but as I've just asked: do we even know that we do or what we do different?

You're really prickly this week. is your lass on the blob?

Costs too much. i've heard we're considering public transport

I never implied anything, everything doesn't have to be explicit, you know.

Yes eat fecking kfc and burgers after the game



We appear not to enter/finish games in the same professional manner as the top clubs do.

Surely explicit and implied aren't the same thing