Very true....divide and conquer is what they are relying on.

Look what happened at the Hudds game, some fans slated for a banner, yet the following week 1000s chanting Agar out

No offence intended, but I think that's slightly paranoid TBH. Things are rather overheated on here ATM for understandable reasons, but I don't think that [imeasured[/i criticism has been frowned on in the past.


Nobody ever accused sports fans of being rational during games.

Cunningly disguised as a call to unity.




The fans at the Hudds game were slated because of their behaviour, not because they had a banner [iper se[/i.

I wasn't just talking about this message board. I've been to most of the fans forums and on the rare occassion someone asks a difficult question or says something a bit negative you get a lot of mumbling and tuts from the fans and giving the person the evil eye etc. I agree that generally on here it's more tolerant but some posters have been abused in the past for having a negative opinion.

well i have read some of the posts on here i think we have got split differences on our own supporters, but when it comes down to it if you and pay your money your entitled to your say regardless if its right or wrong everyone has a different opinion, mine is i want hull to be challenging for silverware and be playing enjoyable and exciting rugby right or wrong that is how i feel

I don't think anyone doesn't want that, what the division is concerns wether it's remotely likely with the way things are set up at the moment.

well i dont think it will happen with how things are set up but keep buying passes and shirts etc every year going home and away like most supporters i think your allowed to have your opinion regardless being positive or negative towards the club.

But you can't deny that this also happens the other way.
I don't think that Agar is the right man for the job, but because i don't rip into the club for the tiniest thing I get called an apologist, sycophant etc.

Very true, it absolutely works both ways!

I'm loyal. I have written 'Harlequins Rugby League Football Club' on my willie.

I wouldn't deny that it works both ways in terms of name calling etc but it's usually the "club apologists" that tend to be the snobby type fans who think they are better than other fans. I've never booed at a game, I've never left early etc etc but that doesn't make me better than any other fan, just different.

In lower case and around it, not along it. (Allegedly)

I don't agree, I think there's people on both sides of the argument that look down their noses at the others, and think they know best.

I'm not sure thinking you know best and thinking your a better fan are the same thing.

It's a class thing now.







Utter baloney!

A class thing?

People wanting the team to lose "for the good of the club" are basically claiming they're more of a fan, just as much as the people who claim these people aren't "true fans". IMO.

I'd heard you'd tried to write QUINS on it but couldn't fit the N and the S

Really? I've not seen a single person who wants the team to lose to get rid of Agar claiming to be a better fan. I'll happily stand corrected if you can find one though.

Can you find me a single person who's explicitly said they're a better fan? Either way?

Pervert, stop looking through my window!!

Rules a d!ckhead and Rich is sound.

Whose the snob out of them two?

I've seen lots of "your not a true fan" type comments which kinda suggests they think they are a better fan. I'll also assume those fans singing "loyal supporters" at those 2 that got ejected on Sunday also think they are better fans than them.

Are you on crack? Seriously I have no idea what your talking about?