Don't understand the article in a way . At first it says about more players needed because of the backlog of fixtures , then it mentions about sending players out on loan to fit the new players in . Is it numbers were after or better quality !

After giving this some thought I have narrowed this down to Brough he nearly come during the season he has had big fall out over there, Pearson and Radders wanted him, he wanted to come if you believe all the rumors I just can not see any other player who fits the profile the outside back could be from rovers or Salford or even the championship the only other player I can think off whos available and whos plans have gone into disarray is Addy

..... but the club is in a pickle, desperately offloading and binning youngsters, we can't possible afford anyone else.
It's what happens when you fail to win all 3 trophies I guess.

Stop talking rubbish, are you just short of brain cells all the time or deliberately trolling just because you don't have the capacity to join into a debate about who we are signing and how we can fit X/Y/Z player in and who is leaving/being loaned out to make way for them.
Give it up, it's way past your bedtime sonny!

.....Only repeating what you said, so rubbish is about right. You soon resort to insults don't you?

Nothing new there, bumpy.

Who would want to debate anything with the likes of yourself? Count me out.

In a pickle!!!! We might be in a few things but in a pickle we are not. We are as you put it 'binning' players that won't make it or are not developing as we hoped they would, we are certainly not desperate believe me and all will be revealed when the club have it sorted.

I guess bumpy's on your foe's list!

Well, quite. 2016's been quite a year and those in charge of recruitment have done pretty well despite scepticism from many supporters. Suggestions of desperation when we'll retain the vast majority of a very good squad and are yet to announce the final version are, well, desperate.

[url
I
[/url

Tom Lineham will not come back as long as Pearson owns the club

Sorry Wilf i think you missed His effort to be sarcastic at another posters comment

Go back and read bumpys post on the previous page

As for the club, it's positive for me if the offload some of the squad and recruit better players. It would be vry easy to rest on our laurels but seemingly we're not

Given AP's comments that we are aiming for the Grand Final next season it kind of makes sense that whoever is coming in is going to be first choice to help us go one step further than we did this season.

But it also makes sense to me that it could be squad players. I don't think we made as good use of the squad as we could have this year as evidenced by a lot of our first choice players looking like they had run out of energy by the end of the season. If we can improve the squad so that Radders will feel more comfortable rotating more often then I think that will be beneficial to us.

Interesting times. Can't wait to see who we bring in.

Daniel Mortimer is the name being mentioned on twitter , is he available ? I thought tigers were after him to replace Farrah

Kr reported to have agreed a deal b ut I guess that is out now

He's fairly recently followed Hull KR on twitter but I'd imagine that any deal will, as you say, be null and void.

I thought both of his previous posts were quite funny and ironically
sarcarstic. Everything thing on here is RUMOURS!!!!

Doesn't excite me, doesn't seem much better than we have and would have to release a player to sign him.

No Danny? www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/37601554

No Danny? www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/37601554

.. no bad thing, gives him an extra month's recovery time. England's last game is on November 13th.

We had a great season in large part because we have better players than we used to. If we further improve the quality of our playing staff then it can only be good news.

No game for Hull FC in the WCS with this only hinting at a two game series, seven of eight finalist in the nrl dont want to be involved apparently & Cronulla want the game in Australia. www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... rygkt.html

No game for Hull FC in the WCS with this only hinting at a two game series, seven of eight finalist in the nrl dont want to be involved apparently & Cronulla want the game in Australia. www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... rygkt.html

Surely cup winners get priority over Shield winners

Major and minor premiers should get it. As good as winning the cup was, we had to win 4 games. Warrington were the best team in the comp after 30 games. They deserve their place IMO.

Agreed.

It's a shame we probably won't get to see FC play a game, but can't really blame the Aussies for not wanting to participate. It's at an awful time of the year for them to fly over and disrupts their pre-season.

Maybe if the International game wasn't shoehorned into a 5-week period each October/November, the matches could be played a couple of weeks after each GF. It'd also help if the GF's were played on the same weekend of course.

Warrington was the best team in the super 8s...wr was the best team after the regular rounds.The Lls is a joke tbh,if results had gone right STS could have topped the table....would they be worthy winners