Neither would I, given the rumours.

Shame though as i would love to see him in B & W , one of the stand out centres of the SL era

Hey can someone pm me with whats going on, theres nothing on the wigan side, not even the slightest discussion about him, as soon as his names up it gets canned.

As it would here. Nothing to see, move along please...

cool as a cucumber chris , like it

fair enough,
im struggling to understand why some places can talk about the "sacking" like on radio Manchester this weekend, yet us fans on a virtual street corner cant.

I'd hazard a guess that they are only discussing the fact he's gone and not why and also that they have a liability insurance that we certainly don't have!!

what if we classed it as "third party fire and theft" then??

If that means we don't discuss the supposed reasons why then I'm happy with that!!!

Jesus, can't believe what I've been told

Yep its true , Mason has signed for rovers FACT

Believe it mate, we DID score over 40 on Friday.

And marting gleeson has

This is going only one way folks.....

We have a decent half back at last?.

it's just been on humberside, saying it would not be good business sacking jordan tansey and signing martin gleeson

Hello would someone be good enough to PM me what he has done,thankyou.

Who is saying this exactly? It would be rank hypocrisy, clearly, but whether getting Gleeson on a cheap deal would be "bad business" is another question.

I'm sure someone will. I received a PM about what he's supposed to have done despite stating quite explicitly on this very thread that I didn't want one.

Yeah someone replied thanks, if it is true Hull want to run a mile from him and his agent!!!

I can't see why they're saying it's bad business. Getting someone as good as Gleeson on the cheap must be seen as great business, the baggage he comes with being the problem. Hypocrisy, I'm not sure either, we sacked Tansey for his discipline whereas taking Gleeson on would be taking a player who has been made available by his club.

It's a tricky one, definitely. From a point of principle perspective, it's indefensible. You can't bin off Tansey for drinking if the rumours about Gleeson are true and expect to retain some integrity on the discipline front. And we've spent years getting rid of the worst drinking offenders in the club. In that context it's insane.

However, after 3 years of watching utter bollox on the pitch, I find my indignation/outrage at the suggestion tempered by the fact Gleeson's a quality player and cheap as he'll have few options. How did it come to this?

Could someone PM me too please?

He's a good player but if he's been sacked for discipline then we shouldn't touch him IMO, especially with his old drinking buddy Longy here.

Me too....

Funnily enough I'm almost certain that the PMs contents are incorrect, which just goes to show really.

You should have just started off with my attitude of not caring...