Still dont get the steve michaels signing, played 1 game last year due to form and personal problems, and wasnt even a great player in his pomp, strange siging for me, will offer nothing to the first team IMO, will be gone next year without a doubt

I'd throw rovers a few quid and sign ken sio. Looks way too good for them

Alternatively you could give him a chance and judge him after he's played for us?

You can see in to the future, can you?

People were saying the same about Talanoa, Feka and Thompson.

No, but I can see a waste of time when we sign one, weve a history of it, and tge signing of michaels is no differant to several other signings from the past.... ala todd byrne.... id put good money on it he doesnt play 20 games, or start 15

Could do your right, but ill go on my judgement of seeing him play in the flesh, unlike 99% of the people on here..... strange signing, waste of time, squad player IMO....

Hi All,

I'd like to pass on my most sincere condolances to whoever has the misfortune of sitting next to 'berro's best mate' at the KC this season.

I'm here to talk if you need me.

I think it's Berrigan himself. He hates Michaels.

Spiteful lad that Berrigan

Thats fine then I'll judge Arundel as I have seen in the flesh (Unlike you).

There's a rumour going round that we might make a tackle this weekend.

Can't see it myself.

Like you did with Jordan Thompson?

I've got to admit you are my favourite Rovers poster. Some of the crap you come out with is great.

As youve quoted me, id like to point out that my statement says I saw him play against us for cas, or did you misread that?

Ill be back on here gloating when I said 'I told you so' in about 8 months time

erm...erm.... no, I did not "misread that"

Since you appear to have slated 99% for their opinions of a player or players, based on not seeing them in the flesh (as you do), I then take it that you must have seen enough of JT (in the flesh) to have judged as being initially ‘sceptical’ about his signature for us.

Which tells me that the ability of your ‘judgment’ on which you so rely upon, is a bit wa.nk at best.

Did you get up at 5am to post you'd be delighted to see Michaels fail? Awesome.

Can anyone give me a legitimate reason for signing him? cus I cant think of any if im honest

Because for years we've lacked genuine pace in the backs and people have said yeaman should be nothing more than a sqad player.add to that the fact we started last year with jason crooks on the wing then signed colbon during the season proves to me if a player like micheals becomes available at the right price who can cover those positions you grab him

Granted, he's nippy, but its another siging that has baggage, hoping that he turns into a diamond, just like talanoa, BUT as ive stated, I cant see him ousting yeaman as it stands, although I believe we should have replaced him a while back also, michaels will be a squad player as far as im concerned, all ill say is, the top teams in superleague wouldn't sign a steve michaels IMO

What baggage? Can't remember reading anything that made me think it had disaster wrote all over it although i stand to be corrected

Worried about Taylor on the basis of this game. Salford look ill prepared and unfit, will go backwards on this showing.

Baggage, I mean issues, played 1 gane in a year due to being on comapssionate grounds, says to me, his heads nott in the rite place, but just my opinion, im no psychiatrist

Good to see that you admit you haven't a clue what you're talking about.

Apparently I didnt know what I was on about when I said fc wouldn't finish in the top 8, I got pelters, but I was proven right, we was awful and failed as I predicted

Pretty much everyone but the totally deluded few predicted we'd be out of the 8 last year