You were not the only one who tried to expose the previous administration for who they were.

Oh right, and where did I say I was?

It's just so frustrating when you can see what's wrong looking in but not being able to influence anything. You can see the mistakes happening in front of your nose but no matter how hard you yell nobody listens. Like when Radford's name was mooted and there was collective screech of NOOO from all sides to no avail. Or when Sharp went and Kear. And when Agar got his contract extension on April Fools' day.

It's like one of those nighmares where you're in a room and no-one can see or hear you, or you're running really fast and your feet get heavier and heavier like lead.

As long as you have fishnets on above them lead feet.
You'll do for me.

Surely all radford is saying is he has £400k of salary cap tied up in players either no longer with us (carvell, pitts, arundel) and players he isn't considering (miller, ?) . Hardly a bl00dy conspiracy and confirmation of what I was told a long time ago about salaries paid to pitts, arundell and miller.

I do think there's a bit of kidology as I'm pretty sure we farmed them out so we could use their cap space for others

when we play KR - Travis.

I thought the same. We as a club are operating at full cap, but Radford is working from a squad costing £1.2m. And maybe he didn't want to get into the reasons because he couldn't think of a way to say he's not considering £400k worth of players because they're on his sh*tlist that seems reasonable when we're 3rd from bottom.

What would be the point in freeing up cap space if we have no plans to sign anyone this year?

saving money?? or giving Green some game time.

A projection that if the current rate of spending continued, the club would of finished the year over the cap?

Why mention taking pressure off of the cap then if that's all it is.

That's a possible but is worrying if that's true.