I'll argue no such thing, as for the HDM getting involved, I wonder how much of Northgate Press Allam owns, they seem to be his personal mouth piece. The Council should be getting involved, but they're too busy fighting amongst themselves (not much change there).

We definitely need clarification.

Also, if Richardson and his fellow "directors" had been willing to put theiir hand in their pocket, we'd have been involved in the SMC from day one.

I have heard today that City recently trained on the pitch, but it wasn't from the most reliable of sources so could easily be bullcrap designed to wind up FC fans.

While I agree that there is a personal vendetta going on here, I disagree that they don't care about FC. They know they'd have a much better chance of owning the KC if we weren't tenants, so if they can make it untenable for us to remain there they'd see that as a win.

No. They don't!! The SMC has a watertight lease on the KC.. There is no breaking that service agreement!!

It's watertight provided terms aren't breached. Not suggesting for a second they have been, just that if either council or SMC don't fulfil their obligations, surely the contract would be broken? Don't know what the terms are, like. Doubt there's anything about treating tenants equitably as impartial landlord and custodian of the council's community asset though.

.

It will be intersting if we lose tomorrow night on goal kicks!