Quote ="Matty_HullFC"The team he received on arrival finished 2nd that year. The last he left us with finished 12th. I don't doubt his ability as a coach but his signings were poor and he took us backwards.'"
It finished 2nd after the changes he made improved it beyond recognition. His signings generally weren't bad at all. Having hands tied and forced were reasons for the poorer signings, but the majority were fine. We were screwed over by injuries and a defection, which are the main reasons for the poor performances at the start of 2007 and 2008.
Quote ="Raggytash"Berrigan has not performed at all since his first season here. Even then he failed to match his reputation.'"
Done this argument plenty of times and no-one has yet managed to tell me what it is they expected Berrigan to do that he hasn't and where their expectation came from. Berrgian has been very good in his time here, especially given what he's had to work with.
Quote ="Raggytash"Sing was a poor signing. Any viewers of NRL at the time knew he'd lost his pace. Another total waste of a quota space and generally ineffectual for us. The way he slipped off Leon Pryce at wembley was pathetic too.'"
He'd lost a bit of pace (not that much though, he only really suffered in that area after his foot injury with us), but was still a great player. The amount of work he, along with Raynor and Tony, put in through 2007 was unreal. Possibly the hardest working back three I've ever seen. Picking up on one missed tackle to use as a reason for a player being a poor signing is even more pathetic.
Quote ="Raggytash"No-one is in a position to say if Byrne was the best available or not. Plenty of gambles are made on recruitment, and usually with good coaches - the gamble pays off. This said - Todd was o.k.'"
He was undoubtedly the best available at the time to cover the positions he could, positions that we needed cover for.
Quote ="Raggytash"Cusack was another nothing signing. Almost any prop in the competition could replicate what he's brought to us. Steady Eddy types are not hard to find.'"
He was our best prop for two years and I've not seen any other prop in SL perform the role he did as well as he did in those two years.
Quote ="Raggytash"Hutch was not a gamble like Moa at all. Hutch was in the back end of his career and improvement was unlikey. Moa was a youngster and blatantly had lot of improvement in him. Really untypical Hull FC signing and a refreshing change!'"
They were both gambles on big, overweight props who needed to get fit. Moa just about has, Maiava didn't.