Better effort, probably due to it being a derby, but still a million miles from where we need to be

Our 11th what?

Rovers were very average last night, the better team lost. They certainly need to improve to have any impact in the play offs, which look like a preamble to another Saints v Leeds Grand Final anyway.

After the try was ruled out they showed another replay from the other side and fox NEVER lost contact he had one hand on tansey's ankle =tackle complete!!!

I suggest you watch the replay again, there is daylight between fox and tansey. He did slip off the tackle.

and then grabbed his ankle to start another tackle but during the second tackle Tansey's ball-carying arm did not touch the ground. Therefore, try should have stood. Why didn't they use all of the camera angles before making the decision?

What?and upset Justin again, wish we'd had Thaler,

I thought Rovers fans hated Silverwood - maybe Thaler's just the new villain.

I watched it back dozens of times and couldnt see Fox releasing him for a split second at all. Tackle complete and correct decision for me.

However, the Cooke try where i reclaimed his own bomb his arm/wrist hit the ground before he offloaded for me.

It was the new angle they showed after the try had been awarded. I couldn't see any daylight until they showed that one, when he clearly released - benefit of doubt to attack? I also agree that there was no dayliight between Cooke's hand and the ground - Leeds had a similar try disallowed when Sinfield's (I think it was Sinfield) hand touched the ground before passing. I also think Cooke's second try had enough interference from another Rovers player to have been ruled out for obstruction. Did I mention the player in front of the kick on Cooke's first try who encroached within 10 metres of Tansey - thus offside? Can you tell I'm an FC fan?

Personally i'd have only said the 1st Cooke try should have been disallowed. Our forward pass shouldnt have been disallowed and also Rovers wouldnt have then gone up field the next set and scored. End result 24-12 to us, count ourselves unlucky i think.

The ref knew if he disallowed the Cooke try Justin would have had to go to Red Hall again F--k me he cannot afford another fine

And my opinion is you would make a superb replacement for Cummings.
Totally oblivious to anyone else's viewpoint be it right or wrong. (those blinkers must be a foot long).
You are supremely arrogant.
You will never admit you are wrong.
And quite possibly a meglomaniac.....

TIT

Yeah, and I'm sure I saw Silverwood order all four of the missed tackles which led to 'Fish' running through and setting up Jake for his try.



Please be honest with yourselves. The table doesn't lie.

Yeah, that fully explains the scoreline!



Are you a newcomer to the game?

No...but we all saw him with that stupid smirk on his face when you scored.

You ARE joking there?????

You wouldn't say that if you were stood in front of him

No he's a 'long standing' supporter.

I think it's time for you lot to move on and start composing your excuses for the Hudds game.

Seriously, TRY to be honest with yourselves. It would save you a lot of time and effort on these boards.

Save everyone a lot of time and effort if you f*cked off to your own excuse of a board.

This coming from a t!t denying we were screwed by inept/bent officiating last Saturday.