Let him go but only for the flat month with no extension.
It will help out Cas and improve our relations with the club but more importantly give Burnett some more experience and gametime.
If Tickle does decide to move nearer home at the end of the season Burnett would be my choice as his replacement.

I understand he was willing to go but Hull said no.

I think he will get plenty of game time here as the season progresses.

I reckon we have enough options at SR for a loan spell to have worked, but if the club don't think it's a good idea their reasoning is probably sound.

I would guess that if we didnt have the minimum loan period we would have allowed him to go on loan and give us flexibility to recall him if we pick a knock or two up.

I am surprised Wakefield have not been sounding him out for a loan move.He could fill a car now with other Hull based players currently making the trip West

Dual contract to an NL would allow that

Has that actually happened/ever been confirmed and if so do we know who we have given dual deals to?

It's been talked about at some length on here but i can't recall the club or SL ever confirming it?

Shaun Aiscough proved it

How? He was at Widnes for over 28 days wasn't he?

Thats the bit that confuses me. Do we need to announce in advance which players have a dual contract and with who? I noticed a lot of the Leigh players were dual contracted players but is this set in stone before the season starts or what?!?!

I was of the understanding that if the dual contract scenario is true you have to pre-register your players and cant mix and match during the season otherwise it makes it pointless.

As i say, the biggest confusion for me is that it's never actually been confirmed.

Chris Dean Widnes / Saints

i think you can only do it 3 times and the players have to be under a certain age

Also they can only play for 1 of the clubs on any given weekend

Do you have anything that says about dual contracts? Could than not have simply been a loan?

I would say the whole benefit would be the flexibility a club needs with fringe players. Some fringe players in January may become established first teamers by February so whats the point of having a dual registration! Surely the idea is to highlight a player who is not getting regular first team rugby and does not benefit playing U20s to then go to a NL1/2 club. That way if the player is needed back at short notice this can happen.

Quote ="Big Dave T"Do you have anything that says about dual contracts? Could than not have simply been a loan?'" www.sthelensstar.co.uk/sport/sai ... th_Widnes/ www.widnesvikings.co.uk/article.php?id=16054 Quote St Helens say Dean will be made available for the Vikings when not needed by them.'"

Quote ="Big Dave T"Do you have anything that says about dual contracts? Could than not have simply been a loan?'" www.sthelensstar.co.uk/sport/sai ... th_Widnes/ www.widnesvikings.co.uk/article.php?id=16054 Quote St Helens say Dean will be made available for the Vikings when not needed by them.'"

Quote ="Hutchie"www.sthelensstar.co.uk/sport/saints/news/4771079.Saints_centre_Dean_to_be_dual_registered_with_Widnes/ www.widnesvikings.co.uk/article.php?id=16054 '" Cool thanks, anything from the RFL to say dual contracts exist?

Quote ="Hutchie"www.sthelensstar.co.uk/sport/saints/news/4771079.Saints_centre_Dean_to_be_dual_registered_with_Widnes/ www.widnesvikings.co.uk/article.php?id=16054 '" Cool thanks, anything from the RFL to say dual contracts exist?

I wouldn't let him go, need him for the Easter period. Either back rower gets injured then he'd be straight in for me. Think this dual registration would be more beneficial to players such as J. Briscoe, Lyne, Tuffour or Kent, players who have only just come up to the first team not players who have been around it for 2 or 3 years.

i wouldn't loan him out to another SL club ,Not yet anyway. I'd look at the situation after Easter, It's going to be a tough period for the club.

Scour the net yourself you lazy

Thats a no then.

get through easter and see what the injury front is before we start loaning players out me thinks

No way should we let him go at the moment.

1. We are finally seeing the benefit of some competition for places in the team.

2. We only need one back row injury and he is fairly likely to make the 17.

3. We surely need to rotate the pack if we can over/after Easter, especially with the big cup game coming up.

Agree with bones, wait until after easter, and if everyone is still going, and Burnett has not played, then maybe a loan / dual reg would be the go. I really like and rate Burnett.

Cas have taken Mike Cooper on loan from Wire anyways