Good job its grade A then, with Magic weekend kicking next season off.


Cheers for clarifying

Translator: Your response would have been funny had it been in english, fool.

Now comment on someone's english all you like, just make sure what you're saying makes sense first.



I was actually only having a laugh with my original post.

[url=http://therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=2217Full findings from the MRP[/url



Think they've got that spot on. Also, note that there is no mention of intention on Bailey's behalf.

How can it be "spot on" when he only hit him once...the others missed.

I thought it was one and a half



I just think that they've viewed it correctly.

They also ignored the intent in Bailey's elbows and if they think he was just trying to get up then they have no place in being involved with RL.

Attempted headbutts are fair game now too it would seem.

As he missed with three of those shots, they must be classing attempted punches as being just as serious as actual punches. Shame they don't take the same tough line with head butts. The whole thing stinks.

It's a good job really, that one punch split Bailey's head like a melon. Had the other three landed Radders could well have invited Hannibal Lecter to supper

That's what makes it even more galling

How has Lee been given credit for the long unblemished record and guilty plea?

As I understand it the max punishment for this is 1 match, which he has received. Any "credit " must have come in the level of the fine then.



Seems the RFL process is a bit confused to say the least

Think they should have gone to Specsavers

Pretty sure £300 is the max for a grade A aswell.

Isn't the fine down to covering costs of the meeting?

So where is the credit?

All these trips to red hall for thug bailey this season and not one ban, and heavens knows what else he`s got away with, the attemped head butt on longy springs to mind straight away

ON/637/10 Ryan Bailey Leeds Hull FC v Leeds 04/09/10
ON/629/10 Ryan Bailey Leeds Warrington v Leeds 28/08/10
ON/567/10 Ryan Bailey Leeds Leeds v Wigan 30/07/10
ON/500/10 Ryan Bailey Leeds Hull KR v Leeds 09/07/10
ON/492/10 Ryan Bailey Leeds Leeds v St Helens 03/07/10
ON/363/10 Ryan Bailey Leeds Bradford v Leeds 23/05/10
ON/212/10 Ryan Bailey Leeds Leeds V Hull FC 11/04/10
ON/168/10 Ryan Bailey Leeds Leeds v Bradford 01/04/10
ON/152/10 Ryan Bailey Leeds Wigan v Leeds 26/03/10
ON/36/10 Ryan Bailey Leeds Wakefield v Leeds 14/02/10
ON/08/10 Ryan Bailey Leeds Crusaders v Leeds 29/01/10
ON/776/09 Ryan Bailey Leeds Leeds v Catalans 02/10/09
ON/130/09 Ryan Bailey Leeds St Helens v Leeds 20/03/09
ON/133/09 Ryan Bailey Leeds St Helens v Leeds 20/03/09
ON/84/09 Ryan Bailey Leeds Warrington v Leeds 08/03/09
ON/85/09 Ryan Bailey Leeds Warrington v Leeds 08/03/09
ON/85/09 Ryan Bailey - Appeal against caution Leeds Warrington v Leeds 08/03/09
ON/14/09 Ryan Bailey Leeds Leeds-v-Wakefield 13/02/09

Oh and heres radders trips.....

ON/638/10 Lee Radford Hull FC Hull FC v Leeds 04/09/10
ON/675/09 Lee Radford Hull FC Hull FC v Harlequins 21/08/09

So much for a good record then.......

They've given him the maximum penalty for the offence. Where's the 'credit' for his previous record and guilty plea?

How many times did he visit Red Hall out of them? How many times was he found [unot guilty[/u?

No smoke without fire

Still been found guilty more times than Radford had a case to answer.... All those stats show is the RFL bias towards Leeds..

How many final warnings does Bailey need to get himself a ban FFS??

[urlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=703[/url

[urlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=787[/url

[urlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=718[/url

And especially this one:

[urlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=1705[/url

just answer me this then.....did you see him a few weeks ago raise his knee into carmonts chest? dead cert ban, theres no defence for that, but did he get a ban? no? why? anyone with half a brain knows bailey is a thug, a cowardly thug at that, watch the dvd with hull, he didnt want to know until all his team mates had hold of radders then he tried a cheap shot of a head butt on longy, he`s just a dirty cu*t, simple as that, so why? i ask again why? has this prick not had a ban this season, i can see aswell as the rest of the rugby league nation of fans (except leeds that is)that he`s a dirty player who gets away with it......also the leeds fans didnt seem to complain much about giving people who throw punches bans when mcdermott belt fielden everytime they met, remember peacock throwing punches in two consecutive games at the start of last season too, came running in throwing in the wcc game, no ban for him either? is there a patten emerging here?????

Exactley, just makes a mockery of the whole system.

You've been before us before Mr Bailey, but on this occasion you were tired, so its OK

Oh, that's quality.

My point would be, that if he'd been binned and put on report,
they would still haul him up on the same charge with a possible 1 game
ban as this is the appropriate punnishment for the offence in question. So cos he was sent off and missed over 70 mins and never been sent off before how can that not class as the ban? Utter joke.

Luke is off to Salford, not Leeds