Commiserations on trying thuggish tactics and still losing.

To quote lyrics from The Streets "Dry your eyes mate".................You're best saving all your tears for next Saturday evening when you'll really need them.

Nice try, but as far as trolls go you're definitely not up to the usual standard we see on here. Conference league in fact.

The only embarrassing thing on here is the people who think that because its Bailey means its ok to do it, if it had have been any other Leeds player I highly doubt that Radford would have reacted in the same way.

At the end of the day this is part and parcel of Rugby League. Radders got elbowed in the head and swung a few punches in retaliation. I see this week in, week out and he should have got a yellow at worst. Bailey then tried nutting Long and started with Radders in front of the ref.

He's been very lucky IMO to not see red and he never even got a warning. The ref has certainly cost Hull the game, if somebody got sent off everytime there were a few fisty cuffs we'd see loads of reds every week re: Rob Burrow on Lauaki (just because he's little and couldn't reach him doesn't make it any better).

PS - Leeds will get nowehere in the play offs.

The thing I would like to see is some consistency from the match officials.

Had the roles been reversed and Bailey been the one doing the punching I for one am pretty certain we would not have seen Mr Smith reaching for the Red Card. Most likely on report or a sin binning at most.

You're inside Radders' head now ? If refereeing doesn't work apply to SKY as a commentator.

how did you get on against wire last week?

That's because I'm not trolling, just disappointed that a moderator finds it acceptable to post such drivel.

Quote ="jimmyfivebellies"how did you get on against wire last week?'" news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 484509.stm HTH

Quote ="jimmyfivebellies"how did you get on against wire last week?'" news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 484509.stm HTH

So you reckon that Radford would have happily put up with those elbow blows from anyone other than Bailey? What on Earth leads you to that conclusion?



And in any case, how does that justify what Bailey did?

One of yours started it.

I said I doubt it, you are the one claiming you know somebody's state of mind by saying the elbows were deliberate.

Another disappointment to add to your disappointment of the moderation process on here ? Very disappointing.

I wouldn't make a commentator though too biased. But I know a deliberate elbow when I see one, so do Radders and Agar to name but two more.

Disappointing night all round then.

Oh dear, 26000 posts & you've saved the lamest one for that landmark.

Surely you've got to be disappointed after "scraping" past a team with 12 men for 70 minutes? God knows what Wigan are going to do to you?

Why ? Would we have more chance of winning a 4th GF on the trot if we'd have put 30 or 40 past you tonight ?

No but your form is sh%te ATM and that's what it's all about at this time of the season.

Good enough to beat you lot tonight - that's what it's all about and if you're mantra is to be believed I'm looking forward to HKR handing you another beating next Saturday.

Who knows how far we'll go in the play offs, but it would take a silly man to on come here and publicly write Leeds off.

hull were the better team.we just ran out of steam after playing a man short for 72 mins

FYI I'm a Hull KR fan. Also FWIW I believe that Hull or Rovers only win in the play offs will be in next weeks derby, after that the winner will be eliminated next game.

I'm writing Leeds off because I feel Wigan, Saints and Warrington are all too good for you "ATM" due to the slump you're in. Not a personal dig.

Agreed next week's game is all about bragging rights because neither team will progress any futher.

18 pts to 14 says that Leeds were the better team over 80 minutes.

Sky Sports 1 now if you don't believe me.

law of averages

13 against 12 too