So are you saying you've no proof of your claim that one more games means City pay Fulham £3million?

2 very different sources, neither with a reason to make it sound worse or better than the situation is.
And when the gaffer says "its in the best interset of both parties that he goes" what message does that send out?

That one man is still dry bumming the club

I'd bow to your expertise on the dry bumming, but are you saying Jimmy Bullard playing one more game for Hull City presents Fulham with an additional £3million or are you conceding that was nonsense?

who cares??

to all other posters, I apologise for EXPRO's inability to post his thoughts on any thread i am involved in without being sarcastic, abusive or over argumentative for the sake of it towards everything i post , he has been warned by the mods for this but cant resist so to all other posters i apologise and shall ignore him for the rest of the day and then maybe the threads can stay on topic !!

Well, I hope at least you can keep to your word!

think this topic has gone on long enough,its as tedious as football

In your opinion.

surely if you have noo interest in the football club you just dont read the thread?

and respectively then if it has no interest to rugby fans it should not even be on a rugby forum maybe??, not a dig just an observation

yet at the same time the club share a ground with ourselves therefore many fans i would expect to have dual loyalties. so i see no reason n there been a thread on here and the non football fans can surely just ignore? i would say that makes sense to the majority.

does to me was just being devils advocate, isnt there a tigers forum too??

Inter Milan and AC Milan share a ground, do you expect dual loyalties there? Hull City obviously have their fair share of fans however I think a fair few of our fans support another football team or don't have any interest in the sport. ATEOTD I come on here to talk about Rugby League not the Tiggers, threads like this will attract interest because of idiots like My Uncle Harry not because anyone has any particular interest in football.

Or the fact that any financial troubles City have could possibly have implications towards FC.

Again in your opinion.

and mine too... shall we have a Man U thread too

do we ground share with Man U?

issues with them have as jmuch bearing on FC as do issues with the tigers ...

That one line really shows you up as a clown.

If City go bust, there will be huge implications for us. The fact that they mortgaged their SMC user agreement should concern us. When RBS want their £10mill and city cant pay, god knows what could happen!

not a clown just talkiing the real world, it aint gonna happen , city will not go out of business ( and have a lump of people sat in the wings awaiting any developments) , even if they did go bust there is documenttation in place that protects us from such eventualities so its a non rugby conversation..
but thanks for again taking to the thread to abuse to get your point across , well done

nobody can say city will not go bust and its one thing having people sitting waiting and another actually doing something about it if they did go into admin etc.

suppose your right my friend, however the contract documentation in place for Fcs stay at the KC would not be effected one little bit if they did , all eventualities were very well documented in the tenure contract i assure you..

as for the Tigers, couldnt give a monkeys to be honest if they did or didnt go bust

Jake, EXPRO, Hull KC et al

All of you pack in the baiting and sniping right now, final warnings, next time a thread gets derailed by your petty bitching you'll be taking a break from posting.