They can play like that every week if it keeps that t[io[/isser away.

Well, i thought Wigan were excellent.
A point some people are missing.

I wouldn't say they were excellent, we made them look a lot better on the night then they were.

I don't think they are (or at least most aren't). I can take us being out-thought, but not out-fought. Wigan were superb and I never expected us to beat them. But if everyone had matched Moa's intensity and enthusiasm, at least we wouldn't have been humiliated on national TV.

Thought they were good but we really allowed them to play and made them look excellent. Same as the other 40+ point defeats against wigan and leeds were i remember people said they thought leeds/wigan were excellent in those games.

And I am going to watch American Football next season

no not missing that, as ive said earlier it was Men v under 10's!!
seriously, Wigan was excellent, and all credit to them, we wouldnt have won (imo) with the full squad playing, there defence was awesome, their attack as good, depressing to think we could have kicked on from our GF appereance and been a team like we saw tonight, but as weve come to realise this board hasnt any ambition to be like them, they just want to be the best off the pitch, f*k whats going on it! as long as them tills are ringing there happy!

They were , Richards had a field day. Hull couldn't put a finger on Tomkins and Silverwood was ...himself.

You play to the ref a the end of the day. You find good teams will push it as far as possible till the ref pulls them then.

Not saying we could have won, but a good performance would have pushed them tonight

Well you certainly saw 3 touchdowns tonight .

Like NFL style forward passes? O'Loughlin's pass for Gouldings try was the worst i've seen. Peyton Manning was applauding FFS!

They are the best at what they do, what they do is cheat.

Did they affect the result at the end of the day? Do you think if those tries were dissallowed we would have transmogrified into a different team?

I've got to agree , That pass left Hulls 10 mtr line and the winger caught it 5 mtr's out .

No but heads drop and all that.

What a word that is!




I think there's a world of difference between going in at half time at 12-0 and going in at 22-0.

half time score made no difference on full time result in my opinion

Agreed. If those tries had been chalked off, they'd have scored at some other point. They were all over us from start to finish.

Suppose we'll never know

Sure it was an old Red Dwarf episode

To be honest you need to watch it again on the last replay angle. Additionally you can't use released and caught distance markings as a judgement to whether a pass is forward or not.

I can use my own fecking eyes though.

You cart even go down the momentum rule as O Loughlin was pedestrian at best.

Your Agar out thread is fair enough.
Don't you think it's time the BOD were replaced. If Agar is so obviously that bad then it's the BOD's fault for awarding him a two year deal.

You have coach after coach and you are going nowhere. Yours is a great club and this game needs a strong HullFC but I don't think we are going to see it with this crew in your boardroom.

The number of Hull juniors that make the first team is massive and very impressive. They don't appear to improve though.
From an outsider Horne is no better than in his first season.
Yeaman and Washbrook haven't improved and Hall has gone backwards alarmingly.
Your BOD need to thoroughly address the coaching at SL level so your juniors do improve. The board don't seem capable of doing it though.
Management is about making it happen and yours isn't and won't.
Agar should not IMo be your first target, it should be your board.