Already has.....

I have never said that what i'm seeing is good enough. Just that i believe that our tactics wouldn't look as bad if he had his full squad to chose from. How hard is that to comprehend?

They would look worse as the team could be better than that.

If they are the only tactics Agar Knows then you are easily bloody pleased.

Yes I couldn't quite see how a winger and forwards would improve our passing game and creativity but I see it now thank you.
And before you bang on about laying the platform our halves are not good enough, we rarely use our wingers correctly so what difference pray do tell would it make? NONE. It's our style of play not players missing.
How hard is that to comprehend?

When you look at the amount of handling errors our backs have made is there any wonder agar doesn't like using them. You show me a post were i have declared myself happy with agars tactics and i will gladly apologise.

And who makes us play in that style?????????????????????????

Answers on a post card.

Hmmm, maybe they make errors because our coach doesn't practice the moves with them?

Doesn't like or doesn't know how. Now what sort of coach would be stupid enough not to use his back division, the one he picks and coaches?

If you watched the saints bradford game on friday you would of seen how bradfords forwards battered the saints pack in the 2nd half thus nullifying long and pryces creativity and limiting them to just one try (which had a lot of luck attatched to it). HTH

Spot on. Our back line is poor. More or less all the errors we have made this year have been while attempting to pass the ball along the back line (it's known on here as 5 drives and a kick).

It's not rocket science is it? But for some of the more mentally challenged

Proof?? Thought not.

Proof the returning players will make us better?????

Thought not.

School again tomorrow. He'll have something else to occupy him then.
There's proof.

Some people don't see this though! and we also conceded a try last night trying to do this but that's ok because we were being expansive! You cannot play expansive rugby if you don't have the palyers to execute.

So what you're saying is that a GB winger replacing a 2nd rower on the wing and a NZ International replacing a player who hasn't played FB for 6 years won't improve us?

It's not rocket science is it ?

Proof that they won't?

Thought not.

There is no proof either way, but there are strong suspicions on both sides. Hopefully we'll find out one way or another. And I will go on record right now stating that I hope I am wrong about Agar, nothing would give me greater pleasure than to watch us win the GF under Agar.

About time a british coach won it again.

Agar`s post match reaction on Sporting Life pretty much sums it up.
Horne and Washbrook played well . Yeaman`s try was a try . Their scrum half dived in our second row at the final scrum.We showed character after going 10 nil down.
What more do you want him to say ?

They don't want him to deal in facts. They want him to say:

"I've been reading the RLFans Message Board and thinking about it the Angry Crew have been right all along. I am a clueless individual who should never have been given the job. The five drives and a kick policy which resulted in three tries for backs tonight - two of them wide out - have had their day. Their intercept try was a direct result of us keeping it tight up the middle. Also I can see no improvement in the team if/when Crocker, Lauaki, Raynor, Berrigan and Tony join/rejoin the team. I'm out."

He'll have to get rid of the puppet master first though

I quit

Now you put it that way I can remember he feast of free flowing rugby we played. All 3 of the tries were scored from less than 10 metres out, they were just drives that got lucky