Awful decision by Ganson not to send Burns off.

One of the worst I've seen. How it wasn't a red I'll never know.

Never a red, Ganson got it right.

Trigger happy Ganson bottled it .

I think it was atleast a Sin Bin.


Still think we would have lost even if he had been sent off based on that performance.

Give it a rest it was no worse than the other 20 head high tackles in the game

Ganson is a knob and so were the linesman. Who clearly don't have a clue what was going on.
Why do the RFL bother employing these mugs who get paid to get paid to stick a flag up when a conversion has been kicked. Utter joke of a decision.

Not the point though. He should have walked.

not defending Burns as i thought it was careless more than malicious. He was high from behind but the player did turn his head and body that way so was worse then it was probably intended. If he had got 10 minutes however I wouldnt have complained.

I thought that initially but have seen it since and it's a shocker, I reckon he will cop a ban.

majority of which came from rovers, burns, walker, g horne! hence the sin binning

as for burns should've walked, swinging arm that could've been a lot worse! ganson bottled it!!

one word to use 'karma' as it looks like he'll miss the next couple of games through injury

Dont think it will matter. Dislocated shoulder by all accounts.

See it all the time, if it had been one of ours the reaction would have been different. Could easily have been trying to hit the ball and got it wrong. Too much doubt for any ban.

If Burns' fist had been clenched and he'd swung it in then it would have been red. He didn't so it was the correct call.

Swinging arm to the head and stopped a certain try. At least a sin bin.

He made contact with the head. If there's any consistency, he'll cop a game, intentional or not.

How will that work now that he is injured?

should have got 10 mins at the most, but doesnt excuse us being gash. pity the fans care more than the team

Stopped a certain try? Doubt it Tom, they had at least two others covering. No clenched fist either, penalty was the correct decision.

Crooks was in, with Briscoe on his outside, 20 metres out. Looked all the world to be a try.

It's irrelevant.

It would be moot, effectively. Is there not some rule about if it is seen and penalised but not put on report...? Not sure.

I thought he'd get yellow - Horne ended up taking it instead for one much more innocuous. Red would have been harsh, but away from home and with Ganson's willingness to surprise, not a risk you want to be taking.

Dirty cheapshot merchant and that was in Aus so he has carried on over here.......not at that good as well.

So how can a ban effect a player who can't play anyway? Ridiculous.

That's just one of those things I'm afraid.