Why are these guys in the reserves....?

Because Agar has decided not to start them yet?

because they are both plodders and we have better in the 1st team ??

Bit harsh, i'd have simply said that they are in the reserves because we have fantastic strength in depth this year. Both are still quality players.

Lets be honest they would get in the 17 for more than half the existing Super League sides.

As i said above, shows our strength in depth.

washbrook, one trick pony..
Moa , knee jerk signing as a stop gap because no one else was available
plodders sorry and way below what we have

still good to have as backup though,wont let the team down

Harsh..I agree Moa may have been a knee jerk however as the pitches dry out and become quicker I believe he will do a good job for us.

Still harsh. Washy hasn't recovered from his constant injuries yet and does look to have lost some of his pace but still has an enormous amount to give.

Moa will be a great player for us in the future and is developing. As a 5th choice prop he is doing a fine thing for us. When the grounds firm up we will see a better Moa. (depends whether a quota spot is best used on a 5th choice prop though)

Agar couldn't win with the Moa signing. He would have been slagged off like mad at the time had he not kept him. (especially looking at who else was in for Moa)

Moa will be a quality prop when he gets some game time. Good signing, IMO.

Harsh but true IMHO
Washy is another plodder like the one we let go to rovers last time, same school of youngsters I am afraid. we have seen his best already i think.
Moa i believe we simply kept as no one else was around, and its when the pitches harden that worries me as then it will be harder to keep better and faster backs in check !!

Not impressed with Washy i must admit. Moa i will reserve my opinions till further evidence is seen.

i will go with that !!

Neither have had a chance this season,

Moa looked great last season when he had a good run and got fit, i am sure he will do the same when given the chance, hopfully starting Friday.

Washbrook looked great in 2006, suffered with injuries and not playing his best position, he is an old style LF, and our coachs like to playing in the correct position.

I still think Washbrook could me a very good LF if he was given the chance.

Spot on.

So, that's now Washy, Moa, Yeaman and Hall that are no good. Any more while you're at it?

The mask is beginning to slip.

Be a flippin nightmare on here for if we lose on Friday

Do you know I thought that a couple of weeks ago

Even in the reseves win on Saturday at wigan, Washy was just steady. He really should be dominating a game like that. Simply too slow for me.

I can see your point Dave but to be honest Moa couldnt do anything other than look good last year could he with that shambles going on around him!!, lets hope he proves me wrong like horne has and with Luck Radford is left on the bus because to be fair i have a lot less faith in Radford than Moa!! and hopefully he will start on Friday and then show us what he can do huh, as for washbrook I am not sure what you mean there but our coaches seem to do anything but play in correct positions IE Hall etc however that being the case he is only going to get a shout of Fitz is injured at which point everyone will then say "its cos he isnt match fit"
those that watched the 20s said he was poor there too

and there it is from someone who seems to have seen it!!
one trick pony with no pace, if he is going to be an old fashioned LF he has to be able to break the line too like the good ones always did with pace and power, something he seems to have neither of.
DGMW he is better than I ever would have been but at SL level he is way off being a starter

Don't think Washy has kicked on since 2006 and rightfully finds himself out of the team. Not Moa's biggest fan I thought he'd have more of an impact on the game when he comes off the bench but saying that he'd probably have more of an impact then Radford these days.

not at all just saying it as I see it sorry if it does not coincide with your views again