Great performance from the u20's today against Bradford. Won 52-18 we've got some talent coming through IMO.

jay pitt???

good stuff.

Played the first 40mins at prop, looked solid got better as the half wore on. Didn't play in the 2nd half.

Maybe saving him for the Easter w/end ?

Can anyone post up the line-up? Thanks.

1 Lyne
2 Lyneham
3 J Briscoe
4 Crooks
5 Matthews??
6 Nicko
7 Pickerill
8 Pitts
9 Newton
10 Bell
11 Crane ??
12 Hadley
13 Brown

Was it Matthews at 5
and Newton hooking, replaced by Curtis Jackson (Lee's son)

Pitts did well quite good with ball in hand

not sure,looked like him

Pickerill at 7 .. A relative of former no 7 Clive ?

1 Reece Lynne
2 Tom Lineham
3 Jack Briscoe
4 Ben Cooks
5 Craford Matthews
6 Danny Nicklas
7 Jack Pickerill
8 Jay Pitts
9 James Newton
10 Austin Bell
11 Matty Kingdom
12 Dean Hadley
13 Lewis Brown

14 Ryan Wilson
15 Alex Starling
16 Kurtis Jackson
17 Shane Cusack

Went 12-0 down but then put 40 pts on without reply...all i will say is that Lynne is not a full-back....Pitts went ok towards end of 1st half but the no 10 caught the eye with some strong runs and Lineham scored a long range try and out-paced Shaun Ainscough.

Yes they changed numbers round...heard it on tannoy whilst i was buying a pie

Jackos son looked a bloody handful as well

Agree about Lyne. He can be devastating with ball in hand but can't tackle to save his life.
The 10, Bell ran straight and hard as did the 13. Very impressed with all today. Thought Crooks was outstanding to, he's a real athlete.

How did Nicklas play ?

He played well, as I've said the whole team did after the first ten minutes when they went 12 nil down. Only Reece Lyne's defence was a disappointment, however going forward he was superb.

Played OK but struggled with his kicking. bradford looked like they were going to hammer us early on but we came back well and ran them ragged. Like the look of lineham and crooks did well. pitts got better as the half went on but looks too lightweight for a prop at SL level. lynne really struggled with full back play at times

Spot on all that. Pitts did well but does lack size for a prop

Cheers. Shift in pecking order for Ellis and Nicklas will be interesting to see how he responds.

I thought he was bigger than what he was but if Gentle is looking for a mobile pack then he will slip in well.Was impressed with the defence today as well...you can tell they all train the same,

where was it played? and where are the under 20 in the league? can i view a up to date table any where???

Play at Hull YPI on Chants ave....Table and fixtures on fc website.......Its easier to get to than Brantingham park but i preferd the stand and that there.

realy dint see that regarding lyne! noticed how quick he cottoned on to pitts showing he had good hands!followed him around after pitts first few drives! Never really saw him have a clean chance to show a defensive side as in tackling a man 1 on 1 they scored off a kick that sat up and off a clean break through with a step at pace,took all the high balls well, i missed 1st try we conceded though. But would of had him m o m,most dangerous player going forward,his 2nd try came after his great link up and pass,num 11 should of scored off it but kind of just reward lyne finished it. other than that Lineham really strong,but not seem him under a high ball yet,or have to do much defensively,but carrying it not seen him an error. Strong and fast. Crooks runs tremendous lines,just wish he could put a bit of meat on his bones! Would be hard in SL aginst some of the big fellas that occupy the centre positions! Best performance of the 20s this yr although probably the weakest team we've put out!

Lynes positional play left a lot to be desired and got stood up a few times....had no pressure on him for high balls,his speed got him out of bother after he took a age to pick it up.

Are you serious Lyne was beaten for all 3 of their scores, the reason he didn't get into 1 on 1 situation is because of his lack of positional sense (they just ran by him with ease). He was poor defensively, very poor.