How much longer do we have to put up with this absolute piece of cr-p at stand off.

He's not a STANDOFF......He's not good enough to be in the Hull team......He's not good enough to be a fcking BALL BOY.

AGAR.....WAKE UP and grow some balls and drop him.

Jesus......it obvious to a BLIND MAN.....HE BRINGS NOTHING, ABSOLUTE NOTHING TO THE HULL TEAM.

rant over.

Who would you play instead of him?

Who's the SL standard stand off in our squad you suggest bringing in?

we need a new stand-off altogether. Horne isn't the answer either.

Under contract though and likely to be a hefty wedge to pay him off.

is that everything covered with that rant?

Horne should be back friday.

ready to be ripped to shreds by fans after one bad kick/pass

Ok but who do you think should play at stand-off for the rest of this season?

Who should play at stand-off on Friday?

I`d give Tansey a try at s/o or Berro... Hall f/b

Hall at full back? Don't you remember what happened when that was tried?

I'd try Berrigan there to be honest. Leaving him on the bench isn't working (he barely got into the game today) and he'd at least take some of the creative work off Long.

no doubt if he's fit Horne will just get picked as a default though

There are several players and positional changes I would make to strengthen this area.

Tansey.....Turner.....Whiting......even god forbid Berrigan.....until Horne returns.

He offers us NOTHING......absolutely Nothing.....THAT CANT be hard to better.

So thats much worse combo than Washy then?... and your suggestion is ?????????

Yes it is, did you see Hall at FB last year? I'd spell Houghton with Washy and play Berro at 6 however if Hornes' back he'll play 6.

You sure, I'm pretty certain I heard a report middle of last week saying that he was still at least 3 weeks away from a return.

Certainly did... every game tbh, but after the way he played against Salford, i thought Hall deserved to be a least on the bench..... and i did suggest Berro... as an alternative... the problem has to be solved... and although u

at Tansey at No 6, at least he runs the angles, attacks the line and makes breaks and scores tries with much more flair than Washbrook !!

If i was sure id of said Horne WILL be back friday

but i never i said Horne SHOULD be back friday

Completely agree, he brings nothing to the team whatsoever imo.

It's not Tansey at 6 I

at it's Hall at 1.

Whiting then... theres just got to be a better combination than Washy at 6, mind you, Whiting didnt set the world alight today, so dunno

Me if you like and thats a non idea - Washbrook is not a No 6 and the sooner the people in charge realise this the better - RL is a about pace and he a got non of that not in thought or feet

Washbrook is a loose forward and plays his best rugby there, but while super fitz is here he wont get a game at 13. In the meantime we have to play turner at centre and whiting on the wing because of injury to calderwood and raynors situation etc. Tansey has to be fullback because hall (although his tackling has improved) has zero positional sense in defence. And horney is injured, so washbrook is what we're left with at 6 im afraid

Washbrook A nearly man but he has a lovely smile - I have read your post its a bit of a conundram !!

wow, very harsh, wouldn't have said he was the worst on the pitch today, feel sorry for him, he doesnt get a chance to play in the position he prefers and gets fan bashed repeatedly, I think he is a very professional young man and with the right coaching and position he could be an excellent asset to the club