[urlhttp://www.totalrl.com/features/content.php?feat_id=698&featcat_id=49[/url


Richie Myler has turned down Salford City Reds offer of a new contract


So where's he going to end up

Warrrington. Possibly Wigan.

Probably Saints

I'd be surprised, they have a couple of good young prospects of their own which is why they only offered Long a 1 year deal.

I'm not too bothered if Hulls sign him or not, I think he is overated, he has half a good season in Sl and clubs are willing to chuck stupid money at him.

I was hoping he would stay at Salford and learn his trade there, where he isnt under as much pressure than at a bigger club.

I would also doubt that Saints would sign him as they have better younger players than him already.

Wigan or Warrington bound.

There would be a fee involved....limits it to a few clubs who are happy to pay

My money would be on Wire, I think he is overrated tbh.

Probably Warrington, but maybe Wigan. I doubt it'll be Saints as they already have some good young players, such as Eastmond.
I would like to see him in a Hull FC shirt, but I don't think that it will happen.

If he's all about money probably wire, if he about ambition then it has to be Saints.

Saints have just offloaded Long so maybe they know something that us mere mortals don't.

I doubt Saints will want him. They have two or three excellent prospects and still have Pryce so I don't think they will be interested.

Wire or Wigan.

I'd sign Stefan Rachford though, looks a very good player.

None of them are as good as Myler and Pryce is a 6. IMO he'd be foolish to go to either Wire of Wigan and may as well stay put at Salford.

Amazes me how half a decent season has people apparently clamouring for him, imagine if someone had bought Yeaman after his one season wonder, how disappointed would they be now!

I think so too - at the moment.
Watched him closely on Friday night. Didn't do anything spectacular. Smart kick through for their first try though.

Yeaman had about three good seasons.

I must have missed the other two.

Eastmond is better than Myler IMO.

I also think that Matty Smith is a better 7 than Myler.

Myler also looks more like a stand off to me.

If we could for a sensible price I would sign Myler and play him at 6 with Horne at FB.

Lets agree to disagree.

Myler has a better all round game that either Matty Smith or Eastmond, neither of whom have a kicking game. Also worth noting is the lack of quality around him at Salford

i agree with that.

Quote ="Standee"I must have missed the other two.'" Maybe because you getting old you cant remember that long ago He was very good in 2004, 2005 and outstanding until his injury at saints in 2006. Was poor in 2007 and been inconsistent in the last two years, which hasn't helped with having no decent halfbacks to play with. www.slstats.org/p389/Kirk%20Yeaman.html

Quote ="Standee"I must have missed the other two.'" Maybe because you getting old you cant remember that long ago He was very good in 2004, 2005 and outstanding until his injury at saints in 2006. Was poor in 2007 and been inconsistent in the last two years, which hasn't helped with having no decent halfbacks to play with. www.slstats.org/p389/Kirk%20Yeaman.html

Wouldnt that be boring?

Matty smith main stranght in his kicking game, ask the Saints fans, Eastmond also has a decent kicking game.

Myler short kicking game is good, but long kicking game is poor, his passing game is nothing special but is a great runner of the ball and great support player.

I was watching him closly on Friday and he wasnt orgaising the team like a SH should do. I think he is Richard Horne or Danny Mcguire type player.

You may have a point about playing for salford though, saying that it is sometimes easy to shine in a poor team.

He never had a bad season when Cooke played alongside him!

He is a very good player and would be a very good signing for us, but the money thats been banded around in the media is just silly. If he goes to Wire or Wigan he will achieve nothing and will probably end up leaving after a short while

Don't Wigan have the "next big thing" in one of the tompkins brothers? the way members of my family go on about him you'd think he was up there with Johns/Lockyer and possibly better than both.

I would counter the Matty Smiths argument by saying he cannot command a place in the Celtic team when Quinn and Van Djik are available and has played hooker for them quite a lot. So to say he is better than Myler is a little ott we'll say.

I think Myler will be an even better player with quality around him as he showed for England. As for being a Horne/McGuire type player i'd say he is a better passer and kicker than either of them so that would make him potentially a much better player in the right team.