Good point. There been a few examples of players holding their necks and “simulating” a crusher tackle and going down with a head injury when defending the line. Sometimes gains a rest for their team-mates plus the deliberate “6 again” early in the count is another example of manipulation of the rules to let a team set their defensive line.

Wire seem particularly adept at these “dark arts” but most teams will do it eventually if it’s not stopped (like the PTB into a prone player from a couple of seasons ago for a penalty...,.)

I’ve just read that the disciplinary ruled that there was no shoulder charge in the Savellio incident, as I said earlier it depends what you want to see as opposed to what actually happens.

My last post on this subject..........

I was watching on TV and so I accept that I had a better view of the incident than you would have at the match - you didn't see it - the commentators didn't mention it - the officials didn't see anything wrong with it.. but clearly that doesn't mean that it didn't happen - it did! I originally posted my belief that Griffin was "guilty" to use your terminology - the Disciplinary committee looked at the incident and also decided that he was "guilty". I don't know what's disparaging about that! It will clearly be non-productive to point out the irony of you making the totally disparaging comment about the supposed high tackles that Saints got away with - it obviously depends on what you want to see (to quote!!)

I never mentioned Savelio - get a grip!

Thought the post before last was “ the last post on this subject” you get a grip.
Another super fan who doesn’t go to games, put your socks back on your feet, keyboard warrior.