Quote ="Pal of Mine"Personally I would rather the Council own the KC and at least if anything ever happened to either club we have a roof over our heads. Plus, if these are the facts, why would the council give the KC away to a prospective developer for them to mortgage and make money for themselves? Where is the gain for the council in that?'"
A gift without caveats could still be a gain for the Council in a number of ways, for example we'd gain the money saved from not having to develop the area ourselves.
If that turns out to be the final position of Mr Alam then yes, the Council should walk away, but not before every avenue's explored.
If, as most business men do, Mr Alam's not planning to use his own money, but generate other investment, the Council could even tease out as much detail as possible and look to do it themselves.