Quote ="mogg"I ask now because I am (one of the minority) who is still boycotting games whilst Agar is in charge. I haven't been to a game this season and the only games I get to see are the ones on Sky.'"
Fair enough your choice but it doesn't answer why you withhold your criticism when the team gets a good win but lay into them when they lose.
Quote From watching the game yesterday, I see a squad list with improved personnel but lacking direction, ideas and a game plan.'"
What evidence do you have that there was no plan ? Is there a possibility that there was a plan - which involved hitting Hudds hard and often - something which we actually achieved ? Did the plan assume that the players would execute the basic catching and passing that is required at SL level ? The same level the players achieved over Easter ? A completion rate that would help nullify our obvious disadvantage we take into every game from a kicking game perspective ? Or is it that when we win it's the players that gain the win without a plan, but when we lose it's the coach who doesn't provide one ?
Quote From what I've seen, there's not been enough of an improvement during Agar's tenure to convince me that I'm wrong with my boycott.'"
I'd never boycott personally but you may be right about the lack of improvement. Harder than ever to beat last year's finish now.
Quote As the board are primarily interested in profit over performance, I will withhold my money until they replace the weakest link at this club.'"
If they were only interested in profit they wouldn't have paid transfer fees for Tansey, Westerman, and Obst. Nor would they spend to maximum cap. They wouldn't invest in the community side of the club. The evidence is the opposite of what you claim in this respect.