Think cod'ead should write a book! and no i wouldnt have him back

What's the point of that question? Agar wasn't even Kear's replacement - we had Sharpe in between.

If you're trying to say that Kear is better than Agar then there's little to choose between them IMO and I'd still rather have neither.

im not trying to say anything i was just wondering what hullbg would do if he really had to choose, he says kear isnt the man to replace agar but would have him over agar lol...

Think id rather stick with agar myself

Noticed that and found it rather amusing. Certainly funnier than one of Sharps dry and ever so boring comments

I would agree with cod'ead 100% on this, he would be a brilliant signing as assistant or in some sort of advisor.

We must remember that JK got the sack not ebcuase of any on field problems, because his results where better then our current one will ever be. JK was paid as an assistant when bomber was in charge and ithe same pay rate continued after he left. He refused to attend and perform some tasks previously allocated to the head coach, this brought him into confronation with some people at the club. Indeed some senior players took exception to his style, one in particular threatened to "walk" and this lead to his sacking.

I too would love to read a book by him as he has been around some amazing times and 2005 is in our history and he did what many of our so called greater coaches could not do.

The fact is the choice would never arise like Kosh points out. However given the choice I would go with Kear as i enjoyed the rugby more under him than under Agar. Yes we had bad games but we also had some crackers as well.