we have tacticts

I agree mate , They all seemed to kicked without any direction or effort. On the creativity aspect of the game , There was never going to be any in those conditions .

Weather didnt help but i'd have really liked us to have ran with the ball for at least one of the times when we went for 2. It nearly cost us a victory. We should imo have been turning the screw more against a side like Crusaders.

thats where it comes down to opinions, every penalty we got i was shouting to go for 2. Was always going to be a close game and it paid off. I guess other times it might not but he got the tactics right in the end.

In the end he did. But for me we should have aimed to be out of sight rather than needing a last minute penalty to win.

When we were 2 points in front for example and went for a kick to make it 4 points i can see the benefit of been further in from but i'd have liked us to have a go in the wet conditions. Footwork for the defenders means if we have landed a set play we should have been able to create things, or at least repeat sets to tire them out.

The conditions dictated the style of game both teams played so the going for 2 was a safe option with a kicker of Tickles class and I suppose the result justifies the decision but I thought Child didnt help by hardly taking the teams back more then 7 or 8 metres at the play the ball.