|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 10926 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2021 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="bren2k"icon_lol.gif
I think we should also incorporate an MMA style cage next to the dug-out, in which any visiting 'hard man' can spend 3 rounds with Justin 'The Dark Knight' Poore.'"
To double up for the inhabitants of clown corner?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 360 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2014 | Aug 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quick question TRB/IA:
Is there still a fixed time frame for progression from outline to full planning?
This was discussed at length at the PI. If I recall correctly: Yorkcourt didn't see this as a concern as they were confident plans were already at an advanced stage.
It was 6 weeks, did this get written into the 106?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 10926 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2021 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="TrinitarianWF2"Quick question TRB/IA:
Is there still a fixed time frame for progression from outline to full planning?
This was discussed at length at the PI. If I recall correctly: Yorkcourt didn't see this as a concern as they were confident plans were already at an advanced stage.
It was 6 weeks, did this get written into the 106?'"
This might sound at odds with what we want, but it may not suit us to rush too much. Some of the opportunities opening up would be worth serious consideration. As such I would doubt if you will see developed plans in that time.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 360 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2014 | Aug 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| At the end of the day I think unless we have cement down by this time next year the most amazing plans in the world won't matter. All people will see is us "still messing about with plans".
Come on Rodders, get a wiggle on!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 753 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2016 | Apr 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2107 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Looks good with the corners filled in plus good news emerging that we don't have to rely on the warehousing to get the stadium built. Exciting times love our club love our City.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 53 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2013 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2013 | Apr 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="M62 J30 TRINITY"Looks good with the corners filled in plus good news emerging that we don't have to rely on the warehousing to get the stadium built. Exciting times love our club love our City.'"
WTID !!!!!!!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5507 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2017 | Nov 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Post on the nut-job forum. They seem to be getting excited again.
From Methley & Mickletown Residents Association
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newmarket: Council withdraws £2m finance
The future of the proposed community stadium at Stanley has been dealt a blow following news that Wakefield Council has withdrawn the promise of a £2m contribution to the scheme. A further £2m financial deal has also been withdrawn from a further stadium scheme which was to be built for Castleford Tigers at Glasshoughton.
In a new twist, both Castleford Tigers and Wakefield Wildcats have now been told to share a stadium by Council bosses – something which was suggested by campaigners fighting to save the 240 acre Green Belt site at Stanley and ignored by planners, two Government Inspectors and Secretary of State Eric Pickles, who approved the scheme. Wakefield Wildcats publicly refused to share any stadium with their Castleford rivals, so it is unclear where any co-operation might be forthcoming.
Overall finance was supposed to be provided by the building of huge distribution and other warehousing on the site and permission to build on the Green Belt was only given because the stadium was considered “exceptional circumstances”. If the stadium plan falls by the wayside, questions must be asked whether the rest of the development is legal and what action can be expected from the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government.
Further questions about the financial situation of developer Yorkcourt have also become apparent. Companies House has confirmed that Yorkcourt failed to submit its accounts in December, and a three month deadline has been set. If the company fails to produce its accounts by the deadline, it could face being closed down by HMRC.
Inspector approves footpath on Newmarket site
Development prospects on the northern section of the site between Newmarket Lane and the M62 have also been complicated by the successful challenge of campaigner Colin Seymour to ensure the future of an historic right of way which almost cuts the site in two. Evidence submitted by Mr Seymour and challenged by Wakefield Council and the developer, was upheld by Inspector Susan Doran. Planning approval on this part of the site was given for a hotel and fast food outlet, as well as a number of office units.
HS2 Rail Link: MP meets Secretary of State for Transport
MP Alec Shelbrooke has provided Methley News with details of a meeting he held with Secretary of State Patrick McLoughlin on the subject of the controversial high-speed rail link which is creating problems for some householders and businesses in the area. He told the Secretary of State that so far, the Exceptional Hardship Scheme (EHS), which is being set up to compensate those worst affected, is proving inadequate. An initial consultation on this scheme is being held now to decide the qualifying criteria for compensation. Anybody wishing to submit comments on the scheme can do so online at www.hs2.org.uk. The deadline is 29 April 2013.
Alec also discussed the possibility of re-routing the line further east beyond Pontefract to avoid serious consequences for residents and businesses in Methley, Garforth, Swillington and Woodlesford. He told Methley News that “ the Secretary of State seemed open to the idea that the route might be redrawn”.
Neighbourhood Plan for Methley?
Residents attending the Association’s March meeting were given a presentation from the Oulton & Woodlesford Neighbourhood Plan (OWNP). Questions were raised as to the boundary around the Clumpcliffe area as OWNP have drawn up a proposed boundary which closely follows the proposed HS2 route and includes Clumpcliffe in their area. The question has now arisen as to whether Methley & Mickletown wish to undertake a Neighbourhood Plan of their own. This asks local people how they view the future of their area over the next 20-30 years and gives some influence over future development. Plans are now under way to write to every household in the village to ask if they support such a move. Leeds City Council are keen to promote Neighbourhood Plans and the Association has already identified the need to monitor the intentions of developers, given negative experiences with one developer and a successful objection to unwanted house building in the centre of the village.
|
|
Post on the nut-job forum. They seem to be getting excited again.
From Methley & Mickletown Residents Association
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newmarket: Council withdraws £2m finance
The future of the proposed community stadium at Stanley has been dealt a blow following news that Wakefield Council has withdrawn the promise of a £2m contribution to the scheme. A further £2m financial deal has also been withdrawn from a further stadium scheme which was to be built for Castleford Tigers at Glasshoughton.
In a new twist, both Castleford Tigers and Wakefield Wildcats have now been told to share a stadium by Council bosses – something which was suggested by campaigners fighting to save the 240 acre Green Belt site at Stanley and ignored by planners, two Government Inspectors and Secretary of State Eric Pickles, who approved the scheme. Wakefield Wildcats publicly refused to share any stadium with their Castleford rivals, so it is unclear where any co-operation might be forthcoming.
Overall finance was supposed to be provided by the building of huge distribution and other warehousing on the site and permission to build on the Green Belt was only given because the stadium was considered “exceptional circumstances”. If the stadium plan falls by the wayside, questions must be asked whether the rest of the development is legal and what action can be expected from the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government.
Further questions about the financial situation of developer Yorkcourt have also become apparent. Companies House has confirmed that Yorkcourt failed to submit its accounts in December, and a three month deadline has been set. If the company fails to produce its accounts by the deadline, it could face being closed down by HMRC.
Inspector approves footpath on Newmarket site
Development prospects on the northern section of the site between Newmarket Lane and the M62 have also been complicated by the successful challenge of campaigner Colin Seymour to ensure the future of an historic right of way which almost cuts the site in two. Evidence submitted by Mr Seymour and challenged by Wakefield Council and the developer, was upheld by Inspector Susan Doran. Planning approval on this part of the site was given for a hotel and fast food outlet, as well as a number of office units.
HS2 Rail Link: MP meets Secretary of State for Transport
MP Alec Shelbrooke has provided Methley News with details of a meeting he held with Secretary of State Patrick McLoughlin on the subject of the controversial high-speed rail link which is creating problems for some householders and businesses in the area. He told the Secretary of State that so far, the Exceptional Hardship Scheme (EHS), which is being set up to compensate those worst affected, is proving inadequate. An initial consultation on this scheme is being held now to decide the qualifying criteria for compensation. Anybody wishing to submit comments on the scheme can do so online at www.hs2.org.uk. The deadline is 29 April 2013.
Alec also discussed the possibility of re-routing the line further east beyond Pontefract to avoid serious consequences for residents and businesses in Methley, Garforth, Swillington and Woodlesford. He told Methley News that “ the Secretary of State seemed open to the idea that the route might be redrawn”.
Neighbourhood Plan for Methley?
Residents attending the Association’s March meeting were given a presentation from the Oulton & Woodlesford Neighbourhood Plan (OWNP). Questions were raised as to the boundary around the Clumpcliffe area as OWNP have drawn up a proposed boundary which closely follows the proposed HS2 route and includes Clumpcliffe in their area. The question has now arisen as to whether Methley & Mickletown wish to undertake a Neighbourhood Plan of their own. This asks local people how they view the future of their area over the next 20-30 years and gives some influence over future development. Plans are now under way to write to every household in the village to ask if they support such a move. Leeds City Council are keen to promote Neighbourhood Plans and the Association has already identified the need to monitor the intentions of developers, given negative experiences with one developer and a successful objection to unwanted house building in the centre of the village.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9974 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Keep all the nutters in one place I say!!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2957 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2023 | Apr 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Has this been verified?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2107 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| How desperate and incorrect is that even for the methley nimbys
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2957 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2023 | Apr 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| So for definate, the £2mill is still in the development. That's what you are saying? Hope so.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5507 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2017 | Nov 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| The £2miilion is subject to a council meeting later this month. The bit regarding Yorkcourt appears to be correct.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2107 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Theboyem"The £2miilion is subject to a council meeting later this month. The bit regarding Yorkcourt appears to be correct.'"
Thought York court were selling bits of the development off to langtree? Either way it's gone too far not to happen and too Many quality experienced people working on it for it not to happen
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2957 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2023 | Apr 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| A little perturbed by this as I thought all the money had been signed off and we were just waiting on planning issues. I'd like IA's take on this.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5507 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2017 | Nov 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="M62 J30 TRINITY"Thought York court were selling bits of the development off to langtree? Either way it's gone too far not to happen and too Many quality experienced people working on it for it not to happen'"
Think they've sold some off which was probably always the plan. It would be nice if someone could actually explain how it all works because it doesn't half seem a conveluted way of doing things.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4593 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="TRB"Documents submitted previously. Payment made yesterday. Details out shortly - just getting the words approved by those that matter.'"
Posted on Thursday.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 10926 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2021 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="wakeytrin"Posted on Thursday.
'"
I don't know what's happened to that wording, but the plans are on the portal so it's not really a prolem - just a bit frustrating that it's not being shouted about.
Technically the councils deadline for the £2mill expired last year, so yes, it is awaiting being verified again - but it's still there for us.
As for sharing, that could still happen. I don't like it, but if it has to happen then so be it - it's a lot easier to swallow for us than Cas and I would prefer them to stay in Cas if at possible - which of course they would like also.
As for us refusing to share with Cas - that was based on sharing on a site in GH with no funding - what a ridiculous thing to suggest. If Cas have a hope of a new stadium it is the one at NM - GH is dead barring a miracle - a state that has existed for years.
We should also take note of YC's committment to the scheme. The majority of land at NM is no-longer green-belt - it was removed from GB under the LDF. As such they could have ditched the original application and put a new one in minus the stadium - they haven't and are now committed to our scheme.
Financing a new stadium such as this is a moveable feast. You can plan on X and Y happening and Z providing funding, but no one knows the exact make-up until the plans are passed. As is the case now some of these plans will work out and other possibilities open up. In this environment none of us can tell you the exact make up of the partners / finance that will eventually make this reality.
I am not about to enter into pages of exchanges about the semantics of what I am saying - nor will IA (he is a busy boy these days), but safe to say that we remain confident in the ability of the people involved to deliver the stadium we so desire. I can't control what others do or say but we do keep in constant contact with them and we do request that they consider the supporters, albeit we still feel that this needs improving.
We have worked hard for 9 years now on this campaign and we believe we are 80% of the way through the processes required. We are more excited than anyone too see this brought to a conclusion but, as has always been the case, we cannot rush the process or the people involved - certainly not more than we are doing. I'm sorry, but you're just going to have to keep the faith at this time.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2107 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2018 | Jun 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Thanks for the update TRB the new stadium is so important in returning our great club back to its former glory and stabilising Wakefield Trinity for generations to come that's why everyone involved in trinity are desperate for any news. Looking forward to the final 20% then seeing it get built and making it our new home.
Love this club Love this City
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9974 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| =#FF0000Mischievous posts will be/have been removed.
Repeat offenders will be banned.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 360 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2014 | Aug 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Document: DISS40 - Notice of striking-off action discontinued
Nothing to see. Nice try Mr Fender, but I think you're clutching at straws- even for you.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2957 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2023 | Apr 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| What does that mean?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 13851 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote I performed a search on Companies House. This particular company has this description attached to its recent filing history.
Form - DISS40 .
Description - Strike-Off action discontinued.
What does this mean and what is the relevance?
PS
Simple
carnmores | Wed, 14/09/2005 - 14:36 | Permalink
companies, without laibilities, can be struck off by its members or by CH ; however the striking off has to be discontinued if there is an objection. CH then issues a DISS40 to record that fact.
And an objection can be made
durdledoor | Wed, 06/03/2013 - 12:25 | Permalink
And an objection can be made if there are court proceedings for example, against that company. The objection can be upheld (discontinued Strike Off) to prevent the company from manipulating it's assets in order to keep monies for debtors. So I was told.'"
www.accountingweb.co.uk/anyanswe ... nies-house
I won't pretend I know what any of that means.
|
|
Quote I performed a search on Companies House. This particular company has this description attached to its recent filing history.
Form - DISS40 .
Description - Strike-Off action discontinued.
What does this mean and what is the relevance?
PS
Simple
carnmores | Wed, 14/09/2005 - 14:36 | Permalink
companies, without laibilities, can be struck off by its members or by CH ; however the striking off has to be discontinued if there is an objection. CH then issues a DISS40 to record that fact.
And an objection can be made
durdledoor | Wed, 06/03/2013 - 12:25 | Permalink
And an objection can be made if there are court proceedings for example, against that company. The objection can be upheld (discontinued Strike Off) to prevent the company from manipulating it's assets in order to keep monies for debtors. So I was told.'"
www.accountingweb.co.uk/anyanswe ... nies-house
I won't pretend I know what any of that means.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4163 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2021 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Khlav Kalash"www.accountingweb.co.uk/anyanswers/what-diss40-form-companies-house
I won't pretend I know what any of that means.'"
Presume it is something to do with the methley residents newsletter mentioning the possibility of York court being struck off by companies house for late submission of their accounts.
I suspect that the potential for this to happen is no longer there, hence the strike off being discontinued
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 360 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2014 | Aug 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Spot on.
|
|
|
|
|