Indeed.

Ultimately, the 1873 gives the club some additional income, which we are told goes toward junior development.
IF it didn't exist, the income would need to come from elsewhere or, spending cut from elsewhere. It's that simple.

I don't know the take up on the scheme but, it will certainly generate several £1000 over the year and we should be encouraging more people to join.

The nature of promotion and relegation will make any coach nervous about putting in youngsters at the most critical part of the season and this is the same for any club "under threat".

This is no reason to stop paying into the scheme and every person that drop out, just makes it harder for the club to make ends meet.

One thing that MC should be applauded for is keeping us afloat will the pitiful attendances that we currently have and the young lads will certainly get plenty of game time in the future.

Yes it is simple !!!!

If we had recruited wisely we would have plenty of cash left over to spend more money on junior development. Instead we have urinated money up against a wall by being conned by other clubs and agents into signing people who are not good enough.
It goes even further, if we had someone at the club with the slightest bit of rugby knowledge we may not have been in the perilous situation that we are now in.

Taking injuries out of the situation just tot up the number of players on the side lines who are contributing nothing and have an educated guess at adding up their accumulative wages. If you could cut the amount in half you could replace some of them with decent juniors who would be waiting in the background ready to be called up.

It still riles me that we thought we were being smart by not signing Liam Kay and spending more on the contract of Richard Owen. We had invested time and money in Kay and just when he was ready we ditched him for a player not wanted at Cas.
OK I know that example is history but to me it highlights our approach and attitude towards youth development.

People keep going on about Kay and the others we have let go (I can't even recall their names now - that's how much impact they have made), but no other SL club has deemed them worth a contract.

That suggests the decisions were correct.

It highlights our historical approach - that's fair to say; if we manage to stay up *and* keep hold of Brian Smith for another year though, I really can't see us bypassing young players, being conned by unscrupulous agents or signing over the hill chancers - he's been around the block enough times to avoid all of those pitfalls. I would suggest that the signings he's made since he arrived are a good enough indication that he has an eye for the right player at the right time - and the invigorated performances of players like Miller, Smith (T) and Anderson, and the arrival of Locke, Sio and Tupou would suggest that players will go out of their way to work for him.

I understand the frustration, but cancelling 1873 membership now, or advocating that other people do, is perverse; the timing is totally wrong! And if anyone cancels through annoyance at losing out to the Wigans, Leeds and Shudds of this world - then you probably shouldn't have joined in the first place - it was, and ever will be, thus.

The coach (Webster) was given money to recruit, who else should be making the decisions about which players other than the coach?

In hindsight Webster made some bad choices but at the time many were happy with Paea, Hall and Kirke. The Sammut affair was of Sammuts making and not the clubs and once again who knew the season would become so negative that players wanted out and showed it in their performances, maybe more evidence that Webster was the wrong man.

In efforts to rescue the season the club have made signings and players have left, given the situation, what else would you have done?

No doubt the ins and outs and expansion of the squad has left a few players on the sidelines but this has been an extraordinary season in that regard

If we successfully retain our SL status there's a chance to clear the decks a little and start over again.

How any of that affects the 1873 money is beyond me, that money is ring fenced for junior development and is added to other funding put in by the club.

May be its only me then, but I thought he played much better than Lyne and was light years in front of Riley.

Correct in everything you say about Brian Smith and he is doing a fine job of reversing many of the mistakes made. Lets hope he stays and we build a good club around him. I also know I have harped on about our juniors, I can't see how we can get solid foundations as a club without a change in attitude in that area. Looking in from the outside we are doing far too little.

Lots of good stuff has happened around junior development at the club since 1873 was launched - although we don't make anywhere near enough noise about it, so most people who pay in have no idea.

That said, the current crop has once again been pillaged by the usual suspects - not much we can do about that, other than persist and try to unearth a few gems; realistically, it will be decades before we can stop a young lad and his Dad having their head turned by Leeds, Wigan or Shudds - they have facilities, glamour and success that we can only dream of at the moment. The sad thing is that a lot of these lads, having been promised the moon on a stick, will find themselves on dual reg with little or no chance of seeing first team rugby - whereas if they had a bit of patience and stayed put, they could be playing regular SL and really learning their trade against the big Misters.

Back on topic - we really have become the villains of the Middle 8's; Jamie Peacock and Tyrone McArthy were both banging on about how unfair it is that we've recruited new players on The Superleague Show last night.

If we survive, the narrative is already established - we only managed it because we cheated the system.

OK back on topic from me also. Did anyone ask Mr Peacock about his views on us signing Yates so they could make room to bring in an aussie prop.

Surprisingly not - his parting shot was, "It's ok to bring in a few players, but not all." Wise words from JP there, because clearly we've replaced *all* our players...

Must say I am really getting sick and tired of the constant 'bashing' of our club.
Anyone would think relieving a coach of his job after a disastrous run of defeats and a new coach replacing players to salvage the situation was something new.
All replacements signed before the deadline and no breaching of salary cap!
I think we need to demand the right to reply and refute with Mr Carter and Brian Smith being given the opportunity via both Sky and BBC.
MC did so in League Express, but that is not sufficient media opportunity.
Additionally why does such a great player as Jamie Peacock usually manage to 'spout' garbage about the game?

Sky and even on The Super League show have mentioned that we have had TEN new players since Brian joined us but none of them have managed to mention that two are swaps because mcshane n smith have moved on to where they will be playing. Two have returned to Aus for personal reasons and Ryan has also left the club. Which works out to be 5 players in.

I've not sure if Grix is one of the famous 10

So did they mention anything about drug abuse or bully tactics on the field, some drugs that might have helped there performance over the last season or two, personally I have no time for the club, the club has been put on a pedestal by Sky and there dumb cronies. Nothing against the support they have I might mention before some one comes and has a pop at me.

Anybody would think it was only us who had brought players in?
Bradford brought Caro, Clare, Ryan & Nielsen in not too long before the start of the 8's and they brought in Crossley & Mendieka half way through the season. They felt the need to do that on the back of a season that was going ok, something that ours definitely wasn't!

The likes of Warrington, Leeds, Salford & Widnes brought players in. but unfortunately, as the league table suggests, our needs were greater hence we had to do it on a greater scale. Maybe we should have just accepted our fate and died quietly.

No rules have been broken (unlike Wigan a few years back when in trouble!) so they can all go do one for me.

Just Tweeted Tanya with those facts Pound 4.
Awaiting reply.

Thick as a submarine door

Your has tight as one

So we've strengthened our squad mid season, and stayed within the salary cup, can JP explain where we've gone wrong?

could of punched the telly out last night the thick pillock

I've got a lot of respect for JP in terms of what he's achieved in the game; but he was talking pony last night - repeating the narrative that Eddie and co have created, to justify the fact that their beloved Leigh look unlikely to play their part in the promotion fairy tale at our expense.

Wells can see very little good in what Leigh did. Butt all that Wakey did was fandabidoze. Can see why you think hes brill.personally i d like to see Barry and Terry in the seats fronting the commentary.

Sure, why wouldn't you want the RL equivalent of the Chuckle Brothers fronting the coverage? Sells itself... Warren, Gould = Brains, knowledge and the ability to articulate oneself.
Barry, Terry = Couldn't string a coherent sentence together if their life depended on it!