Thats very unfair - given the progress of the last 2 years. Sure we could do without these, but I think we're a long way from where we were!

We have made massive strides over the last two years, so we have CCJ's, so what..! the club may be contesting it, why pay full amount when you could pay less or nothing..

.

No doubt many other clubs - company's will go through this, it does not mean that every club is going to go bust.. relax calm down and support the Trin

The opportunity to contest has all but gone.
Your "so what"attitude shows a clear lack of understanding of the implications/problems this adverse information causes any business,let alone a new start company trading for less than two years.

You could get one from Provvie

I'm not entirely convinced that these CCJ's paint a picture of a business in chaos; if this online system has been set up to make it easier for claimants to file, it follows that spurious claims, like the pie man, are more likely to be filed. As a victim of vexatious personal injury claims on an almost weekly basis, I have some sympathy.

That said, it is embarassing for these small amounts to be piling up and it does sus no favours at all.

Is there any way of finding out who the ccjs have been raised by?

I'll only answer that if you tell us whats in this letter that Fozzies been going on about.

Quote ="bren2k"I'm not entirely convinced that these CCJ's paint a picture of a business in chaos; if this online system has been set up to make it easier for claimants to file, it follows that spurious claims, like the pie man, are more likely to be filed. As a victim of vexatious personal injury claims on an almost weekly basis, I have some sympathy. That said, it is embarassing for these small amounts to be piling up and it does sus no favours at all.'" If its a spurious claim the company should defend it. www.justice.gov.uk/courts/northa ... -questions

Quote ="bren2k"I'm not entirely convinced that these CCJ's paint a picture of a business in chaos; if this online system has been set up to make it easier for claimants to file, it follows that spurious claims, like the pie man, are more likely to be filed. As a victim of vexatious personal injury claims on an almost weekly basis, I have some sympathy. That said, it is embarassing for these small amounts to be piling up and it does sus no favours at all.'" If its a spurious claim the company should defend it. www.justice.gov.uk/courts/northa ... -questions

Quote ="TURFEDOUT"If its a spurious claim the company should defend it. www.justice.gov.uk/courts/northa ... -questions'" That's the bit that lets us down - if, as the club suggested recently, the majority of these claims are resisted, then we should be doing that before they proceed to judgement; regardless of the details, it doesn't look good to have them stacking up. It also doesn't help that we're the only club with a cyber-stalker; Emperor bigalf is on 24 hour Wakey Watch, fiddling whilst Cas burns.

Quote ="TURFEDOUT"If its a spurious claim the company should defend it. www.justice.gov.uk/courts/northa ... -questions'" That's the bit that lets us down - if, as the club suggested recently, the majority of these claims are resisted, then we should be doing that before they proceed to judgement; regardless of the details, it doesn't look good to have them stacking up. It also doesn't help that we're the only club with a cyber-stalker; Emperor bigalf is on 24 hour Wakey Watch, fiddling whilst Cas burns.

The system is no easier online than the paper system, the same forms have to be filled out, the only diffirence is you click send as opposed to post in a post box. It has speeded the system up a little, but the forms issued by the court are exactly the same, you are no more open to spurious claims than you ever were.

I wish I knew, all we have is that Mr Fozzard has been stirring a massive amount on twitter, not very professional but then again what at Cas is?

Was only wondering on the ccjs cos all the info that is lacking is who's driving them.

Glad your not my accountant bren - 7 CCJ's totalling 50 grand is hardly small.

Thats not what he said is it, "these small amounts to be piling up" and i'm pretty sure he could if he wished add these "small amounts" up to give a larger total figure.

If you are defining the seperate amounts however "small", one is for over 10 grand.

That aside - who are the claimants ?

sorry but that was quite funny

I agree not very professional but I suppose he resigned so he can say what he wishes as he won't have got a goodbye handshake.

Of course I forgot we are in trouble now with these massive CCj's, no one will touch us with a barge pole..!!, I know it does not luck good for the club, but it is not the end of the world, I have faith that the club will sort this out, and we will get more backing from businesses and more people on board, watch this space...

Bleep - No 8 Yesterday

Glad to be of service



BTW - I am on 24hr "Cas Watch" as well

Yet you didn't post about the Cas CCJ on the Cas forum did you?
Why is that I wonder?

As you should be, i here you may have a busy few weeks coming up, why the need to be obsessed with our news i dont know, but hey if it makes you feel better about your own failings - who am i to stop you??

I expect him to go very quiet very soon, thats if you listen to rumours

He'll be too busy on "CSI Cas Vegas 24" to be troubling anyone else.

Did you ever see a film called "perfect storm" cos its coming to a town near you..

Captain Billy Tyne played by Jack Fulton!!

Just wonder if we are missing the point ,with rugby league hell bent on reducing numbers in super league are we not giving them ammo to justify us being in contention? rember what happen to widnes !

No profesional business would wish the stain on C.C.Js on its record affecting every comercial transaction credit line and its ability to attract new investment.