Did he? I know his father Martin Richardson did time for involvement with a shooting at Trotters bar on York road donkeys years since, he had a neck like a rhino, just saying.

Yep he did along with Chev Walker.They pleaded guilty to violent disorder & Bailey got 9 months and Walker 18 months for being caught on CCTV beating some kid up.

[urlhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_yorkshire/3104617.stm[/url

That was Ryan

I think we have crossed wires here, who the hell are we talking about

I'm sure I and many morewould be even more pist-off than Jowitt himself if that was to happen

I think I'm the royal wire crosser here, if you look back a few posts I queried Bailley being put down, I then mentioned his dad, then people just qualified what you had stated. Easy, keep up.

Didn't think it was so long ago that Bailey had his indiscretion.
Was sure there was one after that.
Looks like I was incorrect.

Me too, but realistically I think Grix is here as very good cover for 1-7, nothing more, nice position to be in though!

Jowitt to start at FB with the use of Grix allowing opportunities for him to take a rest during the season. Whilst not a first choice in any position, Grix will get plenty of game time given his versatility.

Yes I know, I was confirming what Vasty said.

My point is, your safeguarding policies are contained to your working environment,other environments contain different policies.You don't write policies,you add to the standard format in a way your company deals with whats contained within that standard.

Just because a policy doesn't exist in your environment,doesn't mean it does not exist in another.

Where does he say otherwise and what's it got to do with Moore.

Try reading the thread..And I'll gladly answer your question?

Think Jowitt will play less games then the past season, we seemed to have over played him and I believe he was carrying a shoulder injury? Remember listening/reading an interview from the club - cant remember which one though. If Max plays half the games of the season I think that is a good target for himself imo

Wakey don't have to suspend Moore at all. He's not convicted of anything and they could quite happily play him up until his trial date.

If he is convicted, the club can decide whether to dismiss him or not. They could just as easily stand by him, on the basis that it had nothing to do with rugby.

Or they could dismiss him on the grounds it brought the club into disrepute, or because there could be an outcome that prevented him from travelling to training.

In essence, they can do what they want before the trial and after the trial, and they will do whatever suits. There have been players who've transgressed and been kept on by their clubs because they are valued, and there have been players moved on for similar transgressions.

What might be uppermost in the club's mind is that they want a settled team rotation and a known playing budget. To suggest the club has to do any particular thing is nonsense.

A much more succinct way of describing it than I could manage; maybe I derailed the discussion by using an example from my own industry?

The point remains - Scott Moore is not guilty of anything as of this moment and the club can do whatever they think best; without sharing all the details with supporters.

I still however, have absolutely no idea what Atomic is banging on about.

You know the ins and outs a lot more than we do, but if the newspaper reports are true and Moore is found guilty on all charges I really can't imagine anything less than a bit of a holiday all paid for by Her majesty.

It all seems over the top for what initially was a speeding issue.
Depends how dangerous the driving was, and of course whether he was drunk etc, whether the police man was injured by accident or whether there was a conscious effort or even someone else involved. There are so many ways the report could be read it's easy to assume he'll be in serious trouble.
You never know, Moore could be suing them for excessive force with the tazer.

None of us know the details, may never know unless he is actually convicted and the report is published

As for the team

1. Jowett
2. Johnstone
3. Arundal
4. Gibson
5. BJB
6. Miller
7. Williams
8. Huby
9. Finn
10. England
11. Kirmond
12. Ashurst
13. Arona

14. Wood
15. Fifita
16. Allgood
17. Sio

If Tupou is still here he still needs to prove his form and fitness for me, though clearly so does Kirmond so both fighting for that second row spot, with Molloy and Crowther able additions.
The backs have a few alternatives with Bill Tupou, Reece Lyne and MCB. Not sure how MCB will turn out so he obviously needs to prove his skills in preseason.
I'd like to see Keegan Hurst staking a claim too but all the others are proven at this level so have the start for me.

I would have thought that if Moore had failed a breathalyser test he would have been banned from driving within days irrespective of any other offense.Surely they wouldn't allow him to continue driving for another 6 months pending trial.So hopefully the charges will not be as severe as first thought and he can continue his career !We can but hope.

Lee Bowyer & Woodgate continued playing for LUFC even through their court case Bowyer played his best football for Leeds during that time

It doesn't work like that...as he is allegedly facing several charges, all of the offences will be dealt with together, and as I said in my previous post, if it does end up going to Crown Court, it could be up to 12 months before the case is heard (if he pleads not guilty).

Like I said to Vasty, there's more chance of me banging the ball out to Miller from DH than Scott Moore next season

Do you know this for sure, or are you just speculating like others on here.
It would appear from your silly thumbs up you'll be quite happy to see him go

Don't think it's a case of him happy to see him go, just because he gives the thumbs up.
The thumbs up could relate to his statement about himself?
For one, I would say BLM is probably more in the know than most on here.