Thought holding down was the first thing you taught them at the goatfarm?

The prob that the WTW have is if they hold out for too long they may end up with nothing for Brough at the end of the season?

It's knowing when it's best to part with him, I am one who would like to see Brough at the Giants as feel he is a good player.

But depends on the deal on offer TBH, we are doing ok at the moment, if he goes to Catalans so be it.

I am sure DB will do what's best for himself and good luck to the lad.

im confused last week many giant fans said we were living in cloud cuckooland if we thought Kirkmond would come at all but its seems we were right with that.

its so funny that Huddersfield who do everything to their advantage are now chasing this signing, maybe its time for ken to crap or get off the pot.

That sounds like you are personally chasing the deal there mate. Maybe Ken is just inspecting the plumbing?

As several of my fellow fans agree - Brough is a 'Que Sera Sera', it doesn't matter one jot if he comes to Hudds, stays at Wakie or flies off to Catalan. We're in no rush if (as a Wakie fan above wrote) we will be paying both his and Kirmond's wages.

most accurate statement ever

It makes life easier for Kirmond, not having to worry about whether the money is there to pay him

If we get Danny Kaye as well as Fat Boy Slim we should be ok for half-time entertainment anyway

yes of course its all about making life easy for Huddersfield and their players , hence why a player you are very interested in still is sitting games out.


but of course there's no way you would let kirkmond go as stated ages ago in these threads . big u turn and epic fail at damage limitation into the posts made on the huddersfield sites.

dangle dangle

But it states in league express Wakefield could not agree terms with Kirmond, that does not sound like a loan deal to me.

Its a done deal.

as it stands it is a loan deal to the end of the season. The meeting was held today but would not tell me what had been said.

Go read em again, theres a difference between letting someone go on loan and letting them go permanently.

Selective reading again, no change there

there's also a difference between saying we don't pay fees then paying fees ,

selective trolling , no change there.

Nope ive addressed a point you made

You've made a completely different one

As you were

yes i made a point saying that if your club let kirkmond go (never said owt about loans ect) that your club would be barking mad. the fish took the bait of other posters and your club offer us kirkmond (on loan) giving us a player who at this present time is more use in your camp than brough.

i look forward to seeing Danny k play if he does come Im sure hev will enjoy playing under kear.

Not sure about that. NB said that Kirmond would have been playing some time at Prop. The performances of Patrick have surprised us all so Kirmond may have struggled for game time. At second row he would have had to kepp Gilmour, fa alogo, Wild out again there is no loss to us.

If Brough gets his head down and NB gets the best out of him Brough will take us to the next level.

BUT

Kirmond will be a great player for you.

Oh well glad its all settled and we can get on with the rugby league side of things.


I'm not too unhappy with the way its worked out.

Never seen Kirmond play... is he any good?

has this been CONFIRMED then ? or more

Hopefully, then the Mods can lock this and we can all get on with the rest of our lives.

Not seen a great deal of him but the bit i have seen YES, not the finished article yet and sadly we won't see that through at Wakey but he's a very good player.

Not seen a great deal of him but the bit i have seen YES, not the finished article yet and sadly we won't see that through at Wakey but he's a very good player.

Announcement due tomorrow. watch this space.

Watch the press tomorrow!

does the mean we will never have a danny brough thred on here ever, ever, ever again in the whole history of the world???

please?

oh except the cartoon one cos that was funny!