|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 853 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2018 | 7 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2022 | Dec 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I truly like the discussion & opinions, they are correct, imo, the land has a covenant on - use for sporting activities.
The council is aware & yes smoke screen & mirrors.
Regarding access, cliff hill - balne lane has a narrow single pass bridge on a rising hill & bad bend.
The view in the air does not show the three distinct levels to the three fields, where the stadium is located is the
Largest area mid level. How visiting coaches would get through & park is mind boggling. Cut & fill in the land would
Not happen. Rain & land water moves on mass to the lowest level - the beck, which does go on flood alert.
Holdsworth mill use to have a dam adjacent for obvious reasons.
A full capacity stadium attendance would be chaos, fire issues & access a sick jokes imo.
We do have fun when the council practice to deceive, maybe they want a fiasco ?
You couldn't write a better storey.
However, I do hope Carter is aware -- Up the TRIN.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 2497 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2014 | 11 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="JINJER"No idea about planning but Fishermanscap does on the surface post a lot like Vasty and certainly has the attitude, who was it that always liked to superimpose "footprints" onto Google maps? Hmmm.'"
Oh give over man, get a grip.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 36144 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="JINJER"No idea about planning but Fishermanscap does on the surface post a lot like Vasty and certainly has the attitude, who was it that always liked to superimpose "footprints" onto Google maps? Hmmm.'"
Oh give over jinjer I thought you were better than that. Frankly I’ve lost interest in the whole thing and I don’t think it has any creedence at all.
However as far as i can see it’s the other posters with the attitude especially wren and shifty who I thought to be pretty decent. I think I know who Fisherman’s cap is and all he seemed to be doing was stating what is obvious - it is viable but unlikely.
If it is him then he’s not connected as such but he knows the industry, he was the one who told me that the plan for BV wouldn’t hold more than 6000 and he was right. Still if we don’t want advice or help then so be it I’m sure after that hostile response he won’t bother. I’ll PM him and find out.
Me I’m grateful for your kind words about me, many thanks.
Oh and I don’t own the rights to google maps either.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 36144 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="newgroundb4wakey"Oh give over man, get a grip.
'"
Well you’re wrong on this one, so you give over
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 4958 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| what concerns me is the precedent has already been set by the Council allowing the Newcold development outside the agreement, there is a legal argument that it should not have gone up but if this second one goes up outside the agreement then although a legal challenge may be brought via a JR its not plain sailing I fear, The developer has nothing to lose! If they did they would have to deliver what they promised with some legal costs on top. What about the guy at the Daily Star he may champion this latest attempt to circumvent the agreement by York Court.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1692 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2023 | Mar 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="REDWHITEANDBLUE"what concerns me is the precedent has already been set by the Council allowing the Newcold development outside the agreement, there is a legal argument that it should not have gone up but if this second one goes up outside the agreement then although a legal challenge may be brought via a JR its not plain sailing I fear, The developer has nothing to lose! If they did they would have to deliver what they promised with some legal costs on top. What about the guy at the Daily Star he may champion this latest attempt to circumvent the agreement by York Court.'"
Regarding planning and them set a precedent I've being thinking the same thing for some time
Surely they can't get away with it a second time!
It's absolutely outrageous
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4163 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2021 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="REDWHITEANDBLUE"what concerns me is the precedent has already been set by the Council allowing the Newcold development outside the agreement, there is a legal argument that it should not have gone up but if this second one goes up outside the agreement then although a legal challenge may be brought via a JR its not plain sailing I fear, The developer has nothing to lose! If they did they would have to deliver what they promised with some legal costs on top. What about the guy at the Daily Star he may champion this latest attempt to circumvent the agreement by York Court.'"
The trusts objection sets out the fact they believe the council may have acted outside of their power first time around and if they allow the latest one a judicial review will be sought.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 13868 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Tricky2309"The trusts objection sets out the fact they believe the council may have acted outside of their power first time around and if they allow the latest one a judicial review will be sought.'"
Good move, last thing Box wants is an investigation into this whole shady saga. The only time we seem to get a response from him is when he feels threatened. Will it help get a stadium? Probably not, but if it could oust the snake somehow then there is the silver lining.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7426 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="REDWHITEANDBLUE"what concerns me is the precedent has already been set by the Council allowing the Newcold development outside the agreement, there is a legal argument that it should not have gone up but if this second one goes up outside the agreement then although a legal challenge may be brought via a JR its not plain sailing I fear, The developer has nothing to lose! If they did they would have to deliver what they promised with some legal costs on top. What about the guy at the Daily Star he may champion this latest attempt to circumvent the agreement by York Court.'"
@CrossyDailyStar
Jeremy Cross, ask him.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 4958 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="JINJER"@CrossyDailyStar
Jeremy Cross, ask him.'"
Thanks for that I will travelling to Africa at the moment as soon as I get to some stable WiFi I will email him. Cheers for the link
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 4958 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Tricky2309"The trusts objection sets out the fact they believe the council may have acted outside of their power first time around and if they allow the latest one a judicial review will be sought.'"
I know that I have read the text but a precedent may have been set on the eyes of a court where there is no redress I am just putting potential concerns from my knowledge of Courts albeit this area is not an area I have operated in.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 853 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2018 | 7 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2022 | Dec 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Go for it red white & blue but you are taking on ceramic box never mind teflon, !
The whole saga is disgusting imo.
Nothing is genuine with this guy except prevailing at all costs !
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5814 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote ="vastman"Oh give over jinjer I thought you were better than that. Frankly I’ve lost interest in the whole thing and I don’t think it has any creedence at all.
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=618503&start=60#
[uHowever as far as i can see it’s the other posters with the attitude especially wren and shifty[/u who I thought to be pretty decent. I think I know who Fisherman’s cap is and all he seemed to be doing was stating what is obvious - it is viable but unlikely.
If it is him then he’s not connected as such but he knows the industry, he was the one who told me that the plan for BV wouldn’t hold more than 6000 and he was right. Still if we don’t want advice or help then so be it I’m sure after that hostile response he won’t bother. I’ll PM him and find out.
Me I’m grateful for your kind words about me, many thanks.
Oh and I don’t own the rights to google maps either.'"
Go on then mate where have I had the attitude exactly and about what.
I've hardly given my views on the proposed Balne Lane thing. The only other time recently I posted on the subject was in reply to the feasibility to Flatcapsman and said-
Quote I agree with most of your points, especially that a committed Council could get one sorted nearly anywhere within reason'" have I got an attitude there? and then went on to which I thought was the best and basically why is Balne Lane anymore likely to be a goer than Newmarket, as it's already so far advanced than Balne lane and why would WMDC pull their fingers out to get Balne done when they've done jack so far, plus who's going to fund the project, which is on the other stadium thread. A perfectly reasonable post I thought.
Maybe you're talking about the post I replied to where someone said that the other poster posts similar to you (which is on the Crowther thread ftr ), I was actually backing you if it wasn't obvious and said although I could see similarities, I just couldn't see it being you at all and actually wondered where you'd been, plus like I said could care less as long as they're not trolling with it. Because apart from silly crap like this I actually have got along with you over the years and think you bring a lot to the forum, and you don't seem the kind to set up an extra account especially after all the stuff thrown you're way over the years by others.
As for this thread, I've posted 3 times, first on page 5 answering PT's question why it may be denied planning and another again on why it may be denied specifically to another and another in reply to one about the Newcold about Newmarket. So again, you know i don't get personal and go in for name calling etc, so if you're going to say I've got an 'attitude' I'd love to know because I can't see anywhere and you know that's not even my style of posting, I leave that to others.
Disappointing Vasty, especially when I've been one of the few posters here over the years and on the VT that have backed you up on some of your let's say you're more confrontational posts, when other people play the poster and not the post and tbf you've done the same for me when the likes of the Leeds Mafia are trying to talk crap about Trinity. Obviously, I may have misjudged you.
|
|
Quote ="vastman"Oh give over jinjer I thought you were better than that. Frankly I’ve lost interest in the whole thing and I don’t think it has any creedence at all.
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=618503&start=60#
[uHowever as far as i can see it’s the other posters with the attitude especially wren and shifty[/u who I thought to be pretty decent. I think I know who Fisherman’s cap is and all he seemed to be doing was stating what is obvious - it is viable but unlikely.
If it is him then he’s not connected as such but he knows the industry, he was the one who told me that the plan for BV wouldn’t hold more than 6000 and he was right. Still if we don’t want advice or help then so be it I’m sure after that hostile response he won’t bother. I’ll PM him and find out.
Me I’m grateful for your kind words about me, many thanks.
Oh and I don’t own the rights to google maps either.'"
Go on then mate where have I had the attitude exactly and about what.
I've hardly given my views on the proposed Balne Lane thing. The only other time recently I posted on the subject was in reply to the feasibility to Flatcapsman and said-
Quote I agree with most of your points, especially that a committed Council could get one sorted nearly anywhere within reason'" have I got an attitude there? and then went on to which I thought was the best and basically why is Balne Lane anymore likely to be a goer than Newmarket, as it's already so far advanced than Balne lane and why would WMDC pull their fingers out to get Balne done when they've done jack so far, plus who's going to fund the project, which is on the other stadium thread. A perfectly reasonable post I thought.
Maybe you're talking about the post I replied to where someone said that the other poster posts similar to you (which is on the Crowther thread ftr ), I was actually backing you if it wasn't obvious and said although I could see similarities, I just couldn't see it being you at all and actually wondered where you'd been, plus like I said could care less as long as they're not trolling with it. Because apart from silly crap like this I actually have got along with you over the years and think you bring a lot to the forum, and you don't seem the kind to set up an extra account especially after all the stuff thrown you're way over the years by others.
As for this thread, I've posted 3 times, first on page 5 answering PT's question why it may be denied planning and another again on why it may be denied specifically to another and another in reply to one about the Newcold about Newmarket. So again, you know i don't get personal and go in for name calling etc, so if you're going to say I've got an 'attitude' I'd love to know because I can't see anywhere and you know that's not even my style of posting, I leave that to others.
Disappointing Vasty, especially when I've been one of the few posters here over the years and on the VT that have backed you up on some of your let's say you're more confrontational posts, when other people play the poster and not the post and tbf you've done the same for me when the likes of the Leeds Mafia are trying to talk crap about Trinity. Obviously, I may have misjudged you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|