Curious statement, that.

Of the 331 posts on the VT thread to date, mine constitute a very small proportion.

In not one of those posts did I say or suggest anything to support your allegation against me, to the best of my recollection. If I did, could you link to it? Not having been camped on there like you have, I may have forgotten something.

Pretty well all my input onto that thread has been to seek to rebut disinformation, factual inaccuracies and downright untruths being posted on there as received wisdom. Including by a few contributors from this forum. As is so often the case, I see the response included plenty of derision, but precious little of substance to actually rebut anything I said.

As indeed I see has been the response to the only other post I have made on this forum in many months.

I would prefer it if you would withdraw that allegation, but I have no expectation that you will.

It's not an allegation, it's an observation; and no, I won't be withdrawing it.

Your endless spin, couched in the language of accountancy, is dull, pedantic and often misleading; you act as an apologist for whomever happens to be feeding you scraps from the Bulls board room and attempt to browbeat anyone who has a different view.

They're also observations by the way, so don't waste your time asking for empirical evidence, links, quotes or any other form of proof; I don't have them, and I'm very comfortable with that.

It was an allegation. "Thanks to Adeybull..."

As it happens, I hear virtually nothing from the "Bulls Boardroom". And I can assure you no-one is feeding me anything. Quite the opposite, in fact. Trying to get any hard facts and truths out of there has always been extremely difficult. Virtually everything I post is from my own assessment and observation. Which is why I have not always called it right.

But, in all of what you said, I see nothing to rebut anything I said. All I see is resentment that someone should have the temerity to challenge some of the utter crap that I see posted. Or to expose some of it for what it is.

This is self evident.

Carvell looks to have seen enough according to sky sports news:
"Carvell, who has reportedly agreed a one-year deal at Hull with the option of a second season, made 164 appearances for Hull from 2001-08, including two Challenge Cup final appearances, before joining the Wolves, for whom he played in last October's Grand Final.

Although Bradford chairman Mark Moore said at the weekend that coach Francis Cummins' squad had been "ring-fenced", it is thought that Carvell has made clear his desire to leave the club, who are in the middle of another crisis after OK Bulls Ltd was put into administration.

The Bulls say all the players have been transferred to a new company, Bradford Bulls 2014 Ltd, but they are facing a possible points deduction with a crucial meeting with the RFL scheduled for Friday."

In their statement today it says that no Bulls players are for sale.......which if the 'rumours' are correct and the original contracts are now null and void, makes sense.

Every member of the playing staff can speak to whoever they want and there would be no fee involved as there are simply no contracts.

Goes on to say how they are hoping that the 'Rugby League Family ' keep their hands off and play by the rules. Unfortunately ( Warrington apart ) the same rule didnt apply to us

Wow that some mind bending leap to the moral high ground they have managed!!!!

Correct Kinley ! Makes you laugh.......

Yep thats what we are doing, much of it from yourself. Thanks for pointing it out.

Way off topic.