I`m not too sure if J.Poore was fully to blame for that tackle. P.Aiton saw the red mist about a minute before & looked to start lifting the Hull player while JP had him around the chest., they could both be blamed.

Again a positive post ended up being a slagging off a Wakey player,well done

great performance from the lads .pity more so called fans didn't turn up to watch them instead of watching Telly ,but what the hell if they win bye 100 points some moron will complain

Didn't Adrian Morley used to get sent off quite regular when he was playing in Oz? He's not turned out too bad for tidying up his game. Poore does need to be smarter, but some of the holding down penalties that were given against him were harsh in my opinion, no worse than Hull's meddling in the tackle. Hopefully next year will see him refine his technical bits to his game.

What did you expect and i've said sod all

I thought the same thing. The lift was worth a penalty but he landed on his back so no one hurt.
The laying on I felt he was being picked out. He was no worse than anyone else.

Infuriating is absolutely the right title for this thread. I don't understand the negative posts after such a great win.

We played against a team that rarely get beaten at home, who if they'd beaten us would have been 5th in the league.
They have 4 players who have played for England, Ellis being possibly the best we have produced for some time and Briscoe who showed up very well against the aussies so no flash in the pan. Three more are being tipped for the same honours. Throw in an aussie international too though a while ago.

We have good players in our side but I'm thinking it would be generally regarded that we were the under dogs in that match up. Added to that the Hull coach is bigging the team up as the best he can put out and has had a great training week up to the game.

We would have to push our skills to the limit to beat them, and we did.
We gave some penalties away for holding down, but the other 100 times we tackled, the holding down was an important part of defending so is needed.
We dropped a couple of passes, but we had to push them to get the space we needed against a team who were defending well and last time out against us defended us completely out of the game. The passes that stuck were in some cases outstanding. Ali to Smith springs to mind.

We had players playing on with what looked to me like pretty serious injuries....or at least painful ones.
We had players matching up against opposition that the press talk about as being better than them, and played their best to compete, and in many cases individually came out on top.
We had a coach who planned a game that although strewn (Spell?) with errors worked in the end.

I don't understand the need to criticise everything about the club, especially the players when we actually win. Many made mistakes, but no one in my opinion played badly, and I am certain that no one put in less than 100%.

So the negative vultures who circle the forums just waiting for something to moan about, by all means criticise the club for CCJs or the ref if you like, or even each other, but in this case, in this game, the players deserve nothing but support imho.

Commentators on sky were quite infuriating as per. Comments like 'they just wont go away!' when we're 6-0 down, like the game was dead and buried. What do they pay these idiots?

Bear in mind that this thread was started during the match (probably in the first half), when to be fair the title was pretty apt. Both teams did their best to give it away with dumb stuff in that first half. It was basically a hot spell towards the end of the game that won us the match.

The "infuriating" thing is that we are a half-decent team that could be so much better if we cut out some of the schoolboy errors. This is highlighted by the fact we still beat Hull on their own patch without playing near our best.

After seeing the title of this thread I thought it was about most of our supporters!

You are the most boring tedious negative poster ever!

in your opinion. I just go on what i see and what im told.

Ive nowt negative to say, a gutsy performance alround ,pitch looked super but about 2inch too long was the reason in my opinion most of the errors from both side

Agreed looked greasy as well.

I think some posters forgot to take their medication last night - I can see no other reason for such negative comments after a fantastic, entertaining win that has kept our season alive for another week and as a bonus, stuck it right up the whinging Mr Gentle.

Sts play Cas at Cas. Not an easy game these days.
We have Widnes at home, not easy either but we can do it.

We could be in 8th by Monday! No reason to be negative.

it would need a big score margin to manage 8th

they lose by 20 we win by 30? is that about right?

their plus 45 we are minus 26 so I'd say 41 pts each way

we were awful last night and handed you guys the game. Have to say though, Danny Kirmond is a great player!

or maybe we out played you

and you look awful

nope you right first time you was crap

Still amazes me how people continue to criticize Tim Smith!! Other players can play much worse and never receive any criticism

Maybe your just an average team punching above your weight with an average coach in charge

Look yes there were errors by both teams, letting a bomb bounce only 10 mins after catching a high ball to score a try is just one of a number but for sheer determination, commitment and offensively high skill level it was a very entertaining game to watch.

The Wakefield pack were immense and led fantastically well by Captain Danny Kirmond. Think we played with a forward interchange light didn't we? Is Mariano injured? Bet there is some sore bodies today after that effort.

Asked the same question of Mariano last night. Did he get injured? As he played ok, but not seen in second half. He was subbed after 26 mins, not to re appear again. Normally if a player has an injury, the touchline reporter has an update on him, as was the case for Holdsworth. NGB4C can you shed any light on the situation?