Kirmond did not want to be with us last time, FFS Wakey, dont take anything in part ex - money or nothing!

He very much enjoyed his time here last time. Whether we want him back as part of this deal is another matter.

He certainly played very well last time out.

Tell Hudds to do one or dictate terms to them and make them pay, any other option is not acceptable, make a stand now.

don't you want furguson back?,would rather keep kirmond here better second rower,but if he did go he would give 100% as always.Also what makes people think these players are rejects of huddersfield maybe they want to leave the club for reasons of their own.Anyway good luck for next season whatever the outcome.

No, not for me. Why go backwards when we can take strides forward. Why, also, should we take Fergie back when he jumped. (yes the administrators touted him but he could have said NO THANKS)

going to Leeds

A friend of kirkmonds told me on Saturday that he was going to be leaving hudds . Both us & Leeds are interested , but we won't pay a transfer fee whereas Leeds will ,so he was in talks with them.
Murph had said he was staying unless someone came in with a transfer fee for him

come on murph dont go and play for uncle kens mob or have you had an better deal offerd

Sounds like Murphy is as good as gone and its just a case of getting the best deal out of Huddersfield that we can.

Edited for accuracy.

who is murphys agent and why is he beeing tarted about when in contract maybe he hashad his

no comprende. speeka da inglish?

I'm pretty narked off with Huddersfield constantly sniffing round and taking our players. I really like Smurph, he is really solid in defence and a true hard worker. Whilst his attacking flair may not be overly noticeable by some, in recent years when he filled in at FB he has been really solid and prevented a lot of tries.

I can see trips to the Galpharm in future leading us to sing "Are you Wakefield in disguise?". (Mind you I dare say a number of F.C. fans may have a similar version of that classic tune to us next year!)

Raliegh yes the other two no.

how did Kirmond go for you on loan last year?

i wouldn't want any of these player in the red white and blue, i don't think that they'd give us much better options than the player we have let go. We should get a decent fee for him if he wants to go to shudds and sign some players we actually want not players we are offered cos they cant fit him under their salary cap. However if they were to offer us a player like danny brough a different decision all together - a player who will actually add something to the team not another squad player like these three would be.

we need to stop signing squad players (we seem to have stopped this to some extent) and start signing some genuine starters.

ideally want murphy to stay, but let's ask for luke robinson, or that big lump with the pony tail to see if they're serious.

He's hardly had chance to show any attacking flair, the ball has rarely got out to the centres or wingers in recent seasons. 5 drives and a kick tactics are a back killer !

As far as i am concerned if he has a year left on his contract why are shudds even talking to him, this is a joke and as usual young lads are seeing the bright lights instead of getting there heads down and learning their craft. Just ask jay pitts.

Not bad at all - worked hard and put in some good stints. Not sure that we need him now though, particularly given the dip in form since returning to Shudds.

I tend to agree with other posters who've said that if Shudds want Murphy, we should make them pay what we think he's worth, not accept another bunch of cast-offs; of whom, Raleigh is ok - the other two are probably surplus to requirements.

re: Raleigh
Agar asked to talk to him, because he wants him, he would be a starter for the Wildcats, not a squad player. Giants dont need him to leave.

That's hardly surprising because the only out and out Prop Forwards we have signed up for next season are Higgins & Hickey.

but he isnt a prop? he's a back rower filling in as the giants let jackson and sculthorpe go and never replaced them. If he joins i'm sure it would be as a back row/loose and prop IF needed. However teams now seem to use a loose as an extra prop so he may be doing the same job, but with a different name!!

Walter...?????

Chopper