|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 554 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2021 | Oct 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| No to a merger
If it is to happen then it should be Us, Cas & Fev, 3 teams in the Wakefield area: 3 teams = a Trinity = team name Wakefield Trinity
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5800 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Trinity Till Death"I'd vote for Wakefield to stay as Wakefield, Cas to stay as Cas, Fev to stay as Fev'"
Same,not interested in merging.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 984 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Same here, think we need another option," No to any merger".
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7787 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| With the first merger thing everything was rushed through and those against it found a way out. Maybe this time 'they' have had time to plan things.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 27039 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2017 | Sep 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4593 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Would not support a merged team, not interested. Wakefield through and through til I die.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 836 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Definately a No to any merger! Watched Wakey since the sixties so it's Wakefield Trinity.... or nothing for me.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 708 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| The ONLY reason a merger should be considered is if the RFL say that neither Wakey or Cas will be awarded a franchise in their own right, but that a merged club would get a franchise - ideally guaranteed for at least 2 franchise periods.
On the assumption that Messrs Richardson & Wright can make the necessary agreements (clearly with additional financial input from the RFL as we saw with Hudds/Sheff & Hull/G'head) I think that based on where both clubs have progressed with planning & financing the new stadia, a merged club would be based on Newmarket Lane.
I don't particularly like the idea of a merger, but I think it is right that the Wakefield district retains a presence in SL and a merger may be the price both Wakey & Cas need to pay to ensure it. If a merged team was formed, I would expect that it is named Wakefield Tigers. From a nostalgic perspective I'd like to see the word "Trinity" retained but I wouldn't expect it to be.
A merged club should find it easier to compete financially with the likes of Leeds, Wigan, Saints & Warrington - the biggest question is whether the fans of both Wakey & Cas would get behind the new team.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1253 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| yep me too
no merger ever
forget it and move on
i am wakefield til i die anyone?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 27039 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2017 | Sep 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Well mutts its seems you have you're answer, or at least part of it.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2319 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Dec 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| That's a big no from me as well. Think some Traditions in rugby should be left alone. Wakefield have a bigger history than some of the other clubs. It may not mean something to other fans (Neutral or not) but sure means something to me.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 5392 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="supercat"That's a big no from me as well. Think some Traditions in rugby should be left alone. Wakefield have a bigger history than some of the other clubs. It may not mean something to other fans (Neutral or not) but sure means something to me.'"
Founder members of the Northern Union. Doesn't guarantee you a place at the top table, but should count for something when your very existence is being questioned.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 15521 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2020 | May 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I'd support a merged team in principle, if the merger itself was handled correctly and the resultant 'super-club' was properly managed. Rather that, than watch two lame ducks limping along for another few years before dieing a slow death.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 8360 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2022 | Apr 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I've gone for top one, if we merge might as well go the whole hog.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 5392 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I'd support a merged club that played in Wakefield. I'd also support a merged club that played in Normanton - the fairest location for all 3 clubs, and my location of preference. I wouldn't give a monkey's about any merged club that played anywhere else. I'd rather support Catalans or the Welsh.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 1899 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2013 | Apr 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Three separate clubs, three separate identities, three separate collectives of traditional values. No. None of the above should happen. Not only would we miss the rivalry but the whole Team Wakefield District would seem fake and insincere. That would be like asking Batley and Dewsbury to link up with Huddersfield to create Team Kirklees or worse still, asking FC and KR to join forces to create Team Unified Hull or something.
Always been dead set against merges and why should I change my mind on the subject now.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 5392 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Wakefieldite"That would be like asking Batley and Dewsbury to link up with Huddersfield to create Team Kirklees.'"
Team Kirklees and Sheffield, please
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 1899 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2013 | Apr 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="RebelRebel"Team Kirklees and Sheffield, please'"
Sorry, I stand corrected. Maybe the Hull unified team should have a bit of a Gateshead flavour in there.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 5392 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 1970 | Jun 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I hate thread like this, merger is not an option either for us, cas or fev I would rather the winner come from one of the three rather than a combination of any
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 3011 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2022 | Sep 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I agree with RDM on this one. Merger should be option Z. Only taken when all other routes have been exhausted and imposed by sky/superleague/rfl.
I think at the moment we have still have a good chance of a franchise in our own right. Assuming some progress is made stadium wise in the next 4 months.
I was actually pro merger last time around but clearly the will wasn't there from other clubs. If it had gone ahead where would that team be now?
For me that opportunity has gone and we should push on for a stand alone franchise.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1040 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2011 | Aug 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="captaincaveman"yep me too
no merger ever
forget it and move on
i am wakefield til i die anyone?'"
Accept your point, but what is that bit.?
To what exactly??
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 44 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2010 | Sep 2010 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I have also watched since 60s and if the only option to carry on watching top-flight rugby in the area was to merge then I would be fully behind it, as long as the new team identity did not favour any side. Don't get me wrong I would prefer to watch Wakefield in its own right, but if it meant that we were on the sidelines while another team in the area got all the glory then to me its a no-brainer. It might also mean that we the supporters might enjoy a few more games rather than coming home from a match and feeling sick as a parrot again!!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3192 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2022 | Sep 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="sixtiescat"I have also watched since 60s and if the only option to carry on watching top-flight rugby in the area was to merge then I would be fully behind it, as long as the new team identity did not favour any side. Don't get me wrong I would prefer to watch Wakefield in its own right, but if it meant that we were on the sidelines while another team in the area got all the glory then to me its a no-brainer. It might also mean that we the supporters might enjoy a few more games rather than coming home from a match and feeling sick as a parrot again!!'"
I've also watched since the 60's and I agree with you. I'd rather watch a merged side provided its a merger rather than a takeover rather that drop into the NL.
I guess it comes down to what you want to see. If you want to watch Wakefield Trinity and are prepared to drop out of SL to preserve the name then that's your choice. I'd much rather merge if that's the only way to stay in SL. I will not watch NL when there is SL. Also I'd like to see a win or two and have a chance of winning some honours.
Of course everything could come together. Planning permission granted, stadium built, franchise for 2012, multi-millionaire put millions into the club and takes us the a Cup and GF double - then unfortunately I woke up.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1481 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2015 | Jun 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| This merger talk really pi##es me off.
The WORST CASE scenario must surely be for WAKEY & CAS to share a stadium which is located centrally in the Wakefield area.
This way we have a show piece West Yorkshire arena can then be used by all other local sport clubs, cuts the costs of 2 stadiums and enables both Wakey & Cas to remain within SL.
It's a no brainer IMHO - especially in the current economic climate.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3842 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I would vote for all clubs to stay on their own, i would hate a merger.
|
|
|
|
|